Let's make a deal

RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
edited November 6, 2009 in Street and Documentary
703928515_RYzx5-L.jpg

703931352_HoB3a-L.jpg

Thanks for looking. C&C always welcome.

Comments

  • michswissmichswiss Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 2,235 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    After spending a few minutes studying them, there's a washed out, almost flat feeling to the processing on the first that is bothersome. Pushed the shadows too much? Not enough contrast or need to lift the black point?

    But then again, I've spent a few minutes studying them because they are somehow compelling. clap.gif The framing feels slightly off in the first with the space behind the merchant and severe placement of the customer on the right.

    But, at the end for me. Enjoying them!
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    I agree with michswiss. Harsh lighting conditions make you work hard to get the exposure you wanted for your main subjects? If you show the originals or make the raw files available, I might be able to help.
    If not now, when?
  • bdcolenbdcolen Registered Users Posts: 3,804 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    rutt wrote:
    I agree with michswiss. Harsh lighting conditions make you work hard to get the exposure you wanted for your main subjects? If you show the originals or make the raw files available, I might be able to help.

    What they said...rolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gif But let me add that, with better processing, and perhaps some cropping, I think you've got two strong images here. clap.gifclap.gif
    bd@bdcolenphoto.com
    "He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan

    "The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
    edited November 5, 2009
    Yeah, I wasn't very happy with either the color or converted vesions, but I liked the scenes. As Rutt said, the light was difficult--very bright sun with the subjects in the shade. Sure hope Canon comes up with a "Make it Cloudy" button someday. Here are the XL color versions, if someone want to take a crack at a better conversion:

    693161620_wdmPF-XL.jpg

    704103589_7Yh93-XL.jpg

    Rutt: I'd be delighted to send you the RAWs. Can you recommend a free large file transfer service? They're probably too big to attach to an email.

    Cheers,
  • thoththoth Registered Users Posts: 1,085 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    Richard wrote:
    Rutt: I'd be delighted to send you the RAWs. Can you recommend a free large file transfer service? They're probably too big to attach to an email.

    Cheers,
    www.yousendit.com has always worked well for me.
    Travis
  • bdcolenbdcolen Registered Users Posts: 3,804 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    Richard wrote:
    Yeah, I wasn't very happy with either the color or converted vesions, but I liked the scenes. As Rutt said, the light was difficult--very bright sun with the subjects in the shade. Sure hope Canon comes up with a "Make it Cloudy" button someday. Here are the XL color versions, if someone want to take a crack at a better conversion:

    693161620_wdmPF-XL.jpg

    704103589_7Yh93-XL.jpg

    Rutt: I'd be delighted to send you the RAWs. Can you recommend a free large file transfer service? They're probably too big to attach to an email.

    Cheers,

    Well, I think this is closer, but Rutt is the real maven here....
    bd@bdcolenphoto.com
    "He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan

    "The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited November 5, 2009
    I dunno, I'm a color kinda guy. I see in color, my camera shoots in color, why fight it? ne_nau.gifrofl

    Good shooting there, Richard. thumb.gif Looks like a great place to shoot too.

    -joel (Who used to develop his own B&W prints back in the day. mwink.gif)
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    Of course it depends what you are after. I took a stab at it using just the posted color jpeg and got this:

    704255992_E2Rrx-L.jpg

    I only three steps to get this:
    1. Used shadow/highlight with the following settings:
      1. Shadow: 59/16/30
      2. Highlight: 50/20/30
      I arrived at these by using Dan Margulis' suggested technique: Turn amount all the way up, adjust tonal width so the effect is where you want it and not too much in other places, adjust amount to taste. I did the highlights first because that light background is the biggest issue and then shadows to get a little more detail instead of big plugged areas. Play with this, you'll be amazed how much detail there is even in the apparently damaged jpegs.
    2. Convert to B&W by just taking the green channel. I look a look at the other two channels, but everything I wanted was in the green channel and I was happy with how the colors mapped to gray in that channel. Faces are almost always best in green, so that's usually my starting point.
    3. A little curve to add drama. I stole detail from the deep shadows for the highlights midtones, where I think it's most needed. You might not even need this. After the first two steps, the image looked pretty good to me. Here is the curve, though:
      704255969_aeQDX-S.jpg
      Note, darkness to the right, not the usual photoshop default.

    You could burn that background a little, but I think you'd do better to crop it a bit and leave it light.
    If not now, when?
  • black mambablack mamba Registered Users Posts: 8,323 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    Hi Richard,

    I've got to tell you. I like your color version of these two scenes immensely more than the B&W version. The colored ones show life and vibrancy.....in my eyes, characteristics completely void in the two B&W interpretations. I know such talk is tantamount to heresy on this forum and I'm sure not trying to stir that pot. I'm just stating a personal opinion as it applies to these shots.

    Tom
    I always wanted to lie naked on a bearskin rug in front of a fireplace. Cracker Barrel didn't take kindly to it.
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2009
    I think there is a lot in this. The color versions would also benefit from some TLC in post. They have the same exposure issues as the B&W versions and also a blue cast in the foreground highlights.
    Hi Richard,

    I've got to tell you. I like your color version of these two scenes immensely more than the B&W version. The colored ones show life and vibrancy.....in my eyes, characteristics completely void in the two B&W interpretations. I know such talk is tantamount to heresy on this forum and I'm sure not trying to stir that pot. I'm just stating a personal opinion as it applies to these shots.

    Tom
    If not now, when?
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
    edited November 6, 2009
    Thanks for all the comments, and special thanks to BD and Rutt for the alternate conversions. They are both improvements over what I posted.

    As some of you know, I play both sides of the fence on the color/BW question. The choice really depends on the individual image. Sometimes, the color is so bland that it is easier to add drama in B&W. More often on the street, the colors are vivid but ugly and may distract attention from the subject. I think this is what made me opt for B&W in the one with the woman customer--there is a guy in bright orange and a bit of bright magenta on either side of her, plus the intense blue of the display box. So she is surrounded by the strongest colors in the frame. Not good for focusing the viewer on her, which is what I wanted.

    Regarding the other one, I originally liked the color version better, then the B&W, but now I'm thinking that color does work better. I just wish I could get people to coordinate their wardrobes a bit. rolleyes1.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.