Overprocessed?? Your opinions
Hi all,
I recently did some headshots for one of my favorite models. She needed a headshot for a pageant she is involved in.
Image #1 is the original frame from the shoot. It's retouched a bit but mostly just resized and sharpened. Image # 2 is the same shot "professionally" processed through Portrait Professional. I backed way off the original PP settings but I've been torched on here before for overprocessing my stuff so my question here is:
In your opinion (humble or otherwise) is image # 2 overprocessed?
Original Image
Portrait Professional Image
__________________
I recently did some headshots for one of my favorite models. She needed a headshot for a pageant she is involved in.
Image #1 is the original frame from the shoot. It's retouched a bit but mostly just resized and sharpened. Image # 2 is the same shot "professionally" processed through Portrait Professional. I backed way off the original PP settings but I've been torched on here before for overprocessing my stuff so my question here is:
In your opinion (humble or otherwise) is image # 2 overprocessed?
Original Image
Portrait Professional Image
__________________
Bilsen (the artist formerly known as John Galt NY)
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
0
Comments
BTW, are her eyes really *that* blue? Amazing!
The "barbie" look is kind of standard for a certain use I guess. I actually prefer the "real" model but I'm not the ultimate client (nor is she in reality). It's been my first lesson in the subjective aspect of what the client wants.
Yes, here eyes are really that blue. No colorizing, no contact lenses, just brightened up a bit in PP. She is actually that beautiful on the set.
Thanks.
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
Houston Portrait Photographer
Children's Illustrator
If that's the starting point for her eyes, I doubt she (or anyone else) would want you to enhance them in any way at all. If she was my daughter, I would point her toward makeup that compliments her instead of covering her up like that.
I'm a bit surprised by your apparent choice to close her mouth in your post processing. At first, I thought you may have touched up a different-yet-similar shot, but it does appear you closed her mouth digitally.
Marikris - I actually backed off the default in PP.
Danny, those are her real eyes. I have enough trouble clicking the shutter without advising on makeup . Not being a Congressman, I know very little about things I know nothing about. I also closed her mouth a bit due to looking at other pageant images online.
The ironic part is that when I started out, I useed to get flogged on here for "plasticizing" skin. Now, when the "client" wants it, I seem to have lost my frame of reference for judging how much.
The advantage is that she starts out so beautiful. As a sidelight, she's also a genuine doll to work with.
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen