"Watch" Those "Planes"

brvheartbrvheart Registered Users Posts: 434 Major grins
edited November 16, 2009 in Other Cool Shots
Well.....no more to be said -

712812575_yRpSC-M.jpg

712813353_tY6iu-M.jpg

712812194_WVUn5-M.jpg

712811516_Z5mLE-M.jpg

712810608_ivbJj-M.jpg

712811139_xuCjh-M.jpg

712811863_sNneU-M.jpg

712813799_L7jED-M.jpg

Comments

  • black mambablack mamba Registered Users Posts: 8,323 Major grins
    edited November 14, 2009
    Well.....I have to say you lost me with set. I find the background to be very distracting. And I think you should have gone with either the watch or the planes as a subject, but not the pair of them. I know you're trying to tie together the fact that the watch is an aviation model but, to me, the combo just doesn't work in this case. Perhaps with a different approach, the same thought process would yield a more successful result.

    Tom
    I always wanted to lie naked on a bearskin rug in front of a fireplace. Cracker Barrel didn't take kindly to it.
  • brvheartbrvheart Registered Users Posts: 434 Major grins
    edited November 14, 2009
    Well, the Blue Angel was just for grins. The Gray play is a B-1B - The Watch Model is Breitling B-1, sorry you dont like it. Maybe move this to the refinery so I learn what would have made for a good shot in your eyes.
  • black mambablack mamba Registered Users Posts: 8,323 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2009
    I'll make a few more comments as long as you recognize that they are just my own personal opinions.....worth whatever value you care to place upon them.

    As I said, the background is not right for this shot. It's too busy, too contrasty with the blue and white " fighting " for attention. The multitude of stars are also distracting from the primary subjects. When you have a highly reflective subject....as in the watch.... it's best to keep it against a darker surrounding. Here you have it in touch with a stark white star that does nothing to compliment the subject, and ,in fact, detracts from it.

    If the watch is to be the main subject, it should be presented as such....shown much closer. A watch as a subject is great as long as its defining details are obvious. A watch at a distance is just a watch. A watch shown with its individual details clearly evident, and emphasized, now begins to speak for itself.

    Very few folks would recognize the grey plane as a B-1 bomber. The same for the watch, most people have no clue it's a B-1. The association you looked to establish between the plane and the watch is just not evident.

    Again, these are just my personal opinions. I'm sure others can see things entirely differently.
    I always wanted to lie naked on a bearskin rug in front of a fireplace. Cracker Barrel didn't take kindly to it.
  • time2smiletime2smile Registered Users Posts: 835 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2009
    Nice pics, looks like you had fun
    clap.gifclap.gif I have the planesclap.gifclap.gif
    :cry :cry I dont have that watch:cry :cry

    Put the watch on a star
    and the planes on a stripe
    Ted....
    It's not what you look at that matters: Its what you see!
    Nikon
    http://www.time2smile.smugmug.com
  • brvheartbrvheart Registered Users Posts: 434 Major grins
    edited November 16, 2009
    I'll make a few more comments as long as you recognize that they are just my own personal opinions.....worth whatever value you care to place upon them.

    As I said, the background is not right for this shot. It's too busy, too contrasty with the blue and white " fighting " for attention. The multitude of stars are also distracting from the primary subjects. When you have a highly reflective subject....as in the watch.... it's best to keep it against a darker surrounding. Here you have it in touch with a stark white star that does nothing to compliment the subject, and ,in fact, detracts from it.

    If the watch is to be the main subject, it should be presented as such....shown much closer. A watch as a subject is great as long as its defining details are obvious. A watch at a distance is just a watch. A watch shown with its individual details clearly evident, and emphasized, now begins to speak for itself.

    Very few folks would recognize the grey plane as a B-1 bomber. The same for the watch, most people have no clue it's a B-1. The association you looked to establish between the plane and the watch is just not evident.

    Again, these are just my personal opinions. I'm sure others can see things entirely differently.

    Understood - I appreciate the feedback
  • brvheartbrvheart Registered Users Posts: 434 Major grins
    edited November 16, 2009
    time2smile wrote:
    Nice pics, looks like you had fun
    clap.gifclap.gif I have the planesclap.gifclap.gif
    :cry :cry I dont have that watch:cry :cry

    Put the watch on a star
    and the planes on a stripe

    thank you :)

    Go get a watch!!! B-1's are more and more rare every day. The new Airwolf just does not compare in my eyes.
Sign In or Register to comment.