Portrait or Landcsape / 24 mm or 95 mm ?

Antonio Correia

Tango

Both for me....

but I do favor #1

R.Jay

Hi Antonio, #1 for me as well - nice composition.

Cheers, Richard.

karlabbott

While #1 is an excellent composition, #2 has the atmospheric element that shrouds the Taj Mahal in mystery. I think #2 does a better job at capturing the nature of the Taj Mahal and therefore it's my preferred composition.

Great Job with both

Eia

Both are lovely - but for me - #1 catches my eye the most!

Antonio Correia

AaronNelson wrote:

Both for me.... but I do favor #1

Hello Aaron D

R.Jay wrote:

Hi Antonio, #1 for me as well - nice composition. Cheers, Richard.

Richard

karlabbott wrote:

While #1 is an excellent composition, #2 has the atmospheric element that shrouds the Taj Mahal in mystery. I think #2 does a better job at capturing the nature of the Taj Mahal and therefore it's my preferred composition. Great Job with both

Thank you Karl

Eia wrote:

Both are lovely - but for me - #1 catches my eye the most!

Eia !
-
The first image is an easy one. Anyone can do it. A cliché.
And so is the second one. Really.

I thought shooting the 1.st picture this way some weeks before being on there.

Not the other one. I wanted to use the 70-200 but I couldn't as I was too near of my target. I really would like to have used the 200mm with the 20D. :cry

Under my point of view, Karl is right about the atmospheric element. I do think that it is an important part of the picture.

The mist was there. It is not made by me. It belongs to the dry season...
A little enhancement, yes of course ...