Studio shoot
JimBarryPhotography
Registered Users Posts: 36 Big grins
Cheese!
Jim Barry
http://www.jimbarryphotography.com/
Some other places to see my work:
FLICKR: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimbarryphotography/
BLOG: http://jimbarryphotography.blogspot.com/
Jim Barry
http://www.jimbarryphotography.com/
Some other places to see my work:
FLICKR: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimbarryphotography/
BLOG: http://jimbarryphotography.blogspot.com/
0
Comments
thanks for sharing!
Just wanted to remind you (re #3): it's almost never pays to shoot a female full height from a male eye level... You gotta be at her waist level or lower...
Thanks!!!
Jim Barry
http://www.jimbarryphotography.com/
Some other places to see my work:
FLICKR: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimbarryphotography/
BLOG: http://jimbarryphotography.blogspot.com/
Nikolai,
Is this because the perspective is distorted so it shortens the legs? That would make sense. So it's typically acceptable to shoot the female from a higher POV when shooting 3/4 and up or when laying or crouching??? I would assume you should always try to elongate the female form, within reason, no matter what position they are in.
Moderator of the People and Go Figure forums
My Smug Site
to each is own, but to me a standing female begins from her legs. Going lower elongates them. Of course you can some comic/dramatic effect if you go too low (as in http://nik.smugmug.com/photos/332184554_irHEW-XL.jpg ), but that was intentional, as was the usage of the WA lens).
You dont always want to elongate something, it's all has to be done withing the certain "box of proportions".
And yes, when a (female) model is sitting or lying down going higher often brings a pleasing view, although staying "leveled" can be good, too. The only thing that I don't find particularly working is going lower for a sitting model, yet again, there always can be exceptions.
HTH