AE Lock on Canon and Flash
Why does the exposure change if I don't recompose between using the AE lock and not using it if I bounce my flash? Here are two pictures, and you can see that the second one (where I pressed AE lock and got a test stobe) exposes brighter. Both are shot with the camera on manual (f/4, 1/60sec, ISO 200) about 2/3 stop under exposed ambient and the flash is set in E-TTL for +0 FEC.
No AE-Lock:
AE-Lock:
Any insights on exactly what is happening here would be appreciated. The metering mode doesn't seem to matter (tried all 4).
No AE-Lock:
AE-Lock:
Any insights on exactly what is happening here would be appreciated. The metering mode doesn't seem to matter (tried all 4).
0
Comments
http://www.imagesbyceci.com
http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
Picadilly, NB, Canada
What I've noticed, is if I'm bouncing the flash and have it flagged to not spill forward, I may have to set the FEC up a stop more more in dim light. However, if I press the AE-lock button and fire the preflash, the I don't need to set the FEC on the flash (or if I do, I get an over-exposure).
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
This is just a first thought, but the only difference between locking the exposure first and not might be 1) allowing the flash to recycle from the metering pre-flash or 2) fluorescent ambient which isn't constant, it flickers.
http://pyryekholm.kuvat.fi/
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
E-TTL measure distance if I am correct. My guess is the bounce is throwing things off.. if you are getting pre-flash in one instance and no preflash in another then one case the bounce flash is measuring the distance wrong. To test this you point the flash directly then I bet both exposures are the same.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com