Field Sports: sell 100-400L to fund 300/2.8IS?
jmphotocraft
Registered Users Posts: 2,987 Major grins
I bought a 100-400L to shoot a daytime soccer tournament last month. It was great, but I know that the 300/2.8 is the ultimate for IQ, speed, and bokeh. At the tournament I tried locking the 100-400 at 300mm for a while to see what it would be like, and I quickly found myself wanting to unlock it. This was on my 1DIIN.
I've landed some paying jobs lately, so I could conceivably sell the 100-400 and buy a used 300/2.8IS. But I don't think I could justify keeping both, or should I just keep saving until I can??
When shooting field sports with a 300, I imagine it is standard practice to also carry another body with a zoom, yes? But what zoom? 70-200? 100-400? I have a 70-200/4LIS and a 5DII I could use for that, if that would be advisable.
I've landed some paying jobs lately, so I could conceivably sell the 100-400 and buy a used 300/2.8IS. But I don't think I could justify keeping both, or should I just keep saving until I can??
When shooting field sports with a 300, I imagine it is standard practice to also carry another body with a zoom, yes? But what zoom? 70-200? 100-400? I have a 70-200/4LIS and a 5DII I could use for that, if that would be advisable.
-Jack
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
0
Comments
When i was shooting American football I did some research and, by far, the combination of 2 bodies and a 300mm, f2.8 or f4, along with a 70-200mm, f2.8, were the favorite combinations for both Nikon and Canon shooters.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Comparison crops
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I wouldn't worry about the color. Big lens makes you somewhat credible no matter the color.
The 120-300 would be a good alternative. I will not say it is as sharp as a prime, but it has a useful range. I have one and I am pleased with its performance. The quality is close to my 70-200 Nikon Vr in the IQ and focus departments.
Well... last Baseball season was my first, and most of my sales were 4x6s
The other use of my pictures is kids taking screen shots of my protected/watermarked proofs and putting them on Facebook.:oogle
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Ok that's not even funny! Wow!
I love that tool, should have thought to use it.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
Those Zeiss primes look yummy, but I'm usually shooting things that move.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
As far as two body setups, 400mm 2.8 and a good monopod + a 70-200 2.8 (is or non)
If you are fortunate enough for a third body, 16-35 or 24-70.
It also does not hurt to have a 1.4x or 2.0x teleconverter in your bag. You could not really use it in poor light, but it would give you some good reach for your outside daylight shots.
I shot College football w/ a 100-400 and that is nice if you only have one body, and with field sports (soccer/football/lacrosse/rugby), I just do not see it possible to shoot w/ a single body and your big tele be a 300/400 prime. Just my opinion, but my game plan would be (and is) to pick up a 2nd body and the 300/400 at the same time (used or refurbished), but that opinion is based upon what I currently shoot. My 70-200 2.8 on a 40D is my current work horse setup and covers 95% of my "needs" however i have other wants
5D2/1D MkII N/40D and a couple bits of glass.
An "accurate" reproduction of a scene and a good photograph are often two different things.
You should amble on over to the WildLife forum. There are usually a good number there.
Mike Mattix
Tulsa, OK
"There are always three sides to every story. Yours, mine, and the truth" - Unknown
@2.8
5D2/1D MkII N/40D and a couple bits of glass.