Moving Rocks - Take 2!

kwalsh

Based on some great input from this thread I've changed the second photo to a crop and found what I think might be a better alternative all together. Would love to hear which of the two people prefer or any other comments.

The Crop:



The Alternative:



Thanks!

Ken

Photometric

I prefer the second. It gets you closer to the look of the rock/ground underneath. But that's a personal preference.

dlplumer

#2 for sure

dbd

kwalsh wrote:

Based on some great input from this thread I've changed the second photo to a crop and found what I think might be a better alternative all together. Would love to hear which of the two people prefer or any other comments.

Ken

I still think you'll need a much longer shutter time to show any motion blur.

Dale B. Dalrymple
http://dbdimages.com

kdog

#2 is super. A veritable rock orgy.


BTW, the rocks are somewhat of a mystery. People have camped out for weeks or even months at a time to study them. They measured them, and they've developed all sorts of theories as to why they move. And yet, nobody has ever seen one move.

Jonnyyaya

Yup 2nd one winner..

Allan FG

#2 is great, love the angle.

Dogdots

I like your crop on the 1st photo. Looks much better then the previous posted photo. I like that my eye is attracted to the distant rock instead of the two in front. My opinion tho

Your 2nd photo here is really good. Much more detail in the ground. I like that your lines have curves to them. It really adds to the photo

kwalsh

Thanks everyone for your input, sounds like everyone likes #2 the best (as do I). I'll put it into my trip gallery instead of the OOF background one in the other thread. Thanks for everyone's time and comments - sometimes it is hardest to edit ones own collection!

Ken

schmoo

Ken I'm speechless by your photos from this trip. I just love your take on the place! So very, very inspiring.