My first wedding: Chris and Chelsea

jdorseydesignjdorseydesign Registered Users Posts: 161 Major grins
edited December 16, 2009 in Weddings
C&C would be appreciated if you have time to give it, what with the holidays and all.

1
740097858_CAtEp-L.jpg
2
740120154_KYvPX-L.jpg
3
740133505_oPiED-L.jpg
4
740140906_xhTKT-L.jpg
5
740143744_NjYgp-L.jpg
6
740148088_ashx3-L.jpg
7
740149283_DaJGV-L.jpg
8
740158784_qseBW-L.jpg
9
740165053_x9mGC-L.jpg
10
740166891_uFVB5-L.jpg
11
740168871_ijxmK-L.jpg
12
740171312_CYLMf-L.jpg
13
740174916_FRkak-L.jpg
14
740185147_yovmN-L.jpg
15
740199050_9GRXj-L.jpg
16
740190844_hiQKW-L.jpg
17
740094679_vFkx4-L.jpg
18
740091528_DWyja-L.jpg
19
740199656_fcCui-L.jpg
J Dorsey Design Photography • jdorseydesign.com • Facebook Fan/Friend • Twitter @bartdorsey

Comments

  • Moogle PepperMoogle Pepper Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2009
    The first one is pretty soft. It would be great for their faces to be sharp.

    Nice first though, I do like the ring shots the most. Was this a small wedding?
    Food & Culture.
    www.tednghiem.com
  • jdorseydesignjdorseydesign Registered Users Posts: 161 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2009
    Moogle Pepper wrote:
    The first one is pretty soft. It would be great for their faces to be sharp.

    Nice first though, I do like the ring shots the most. Was this a small wedding?

    I agree the first one is soft, but I loved the moment I captured.

    Yes, a very small wedding, they had it at her parent's house, there were only like 10 guests (including me and my wife)

    You can see the rest of the set here: http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/10639941_a7qUh/1/740091528_DWyja password: purple26
    J Dorsey Design Photography • jdorseydesign.com • Facebook Fan/Friend • Twitter @bartdorsey
  • emeraldroseemeraldrose Registered Users Posts: 324 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2009
    I iloveyou.gif the ring shots. the most, you have a knack for 'product' or detail shots lol.

    btw what lense/ focal length did you use for 10? and how close were you standing?
    Emerald Rose Photography
  • DECinNCDECinNC Registered Users Posts: 63 Big grins
    edited December 14, 2009
    Nice pictures. On #11 I would suggest cropping so she had more space to look into.
    Dale Childress
  • jdorseydesignjdorseydesign Registered Users Posts: 161 Major grins
    edited December 14, 2009
    emeraldrose wrote:
    I iloveyou.gif the ring shots. the most, you have a knack for 'product' or detail shots lol.

    btw what lense/ focal length did you use for 10? and how close were you standing?

    That's a Nikkor 55-200 VR. At 122mm.. I was probably 5-6 feet away (it was a small ceremony).
    J Dorsey Design Photography • jdorseydesign.com • Facebook Fan/Friend • Twitter @bartdorsey
  • SurfdogSurfdog Registered Users Posts: 297 Major grins
    edited December 15, 2009
    The first shot is a cool moment, but distractingly soft. I like the rest. I really like the "hands on the guitar" shot. I had not seen that done before. I may steal that idea. :D Really nice close-ups.
    http://www.dvivianphoto.com

    Don't worry. I can fix you in photoshop.
  • 905Apertures905Apertures Registered Users Posts: 6 Beginner grinner
    edited December 16, 2009
    In defense of the first shot - the bride will likely look at it and think about what they were giggling at - not that it's soft. We can all see that here and comment about it, but we're supposed to be able to see that kind of thing and call attention to it. Most times, I'd rather capture part of that moment and have it soft or blurred a bit, rather than miss it entirely. I agree that the ring shots are fantastic - love the one with the heel upside down - very cool. Might have to put that one in the back of my head for somebody with a cool pair of heels next time !
Sign In or Register to comment.