Wide Angle Lenses for Nikon

CoryUTCoryUT Registered Users Posts: 367 Major grins
edited December 18, 2009 in Cameras
I'm in the mind to get a wide angle lens for my D40. Eventually I'll upgrade to a D300/s, but I've decided the lens should come first. I'd like to have a wide angle for some trips I'll be taking in the near future, so I'm trying to make my choice. My contenders are:

Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6
Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5

I've ruled out the Tokina 11-16 because of the short range and inability to autofocus on the D40. It seems that the Tamron 10-24 has enough issues to rule it out as well. I really want something wider than 12mm, so that rules out some others.

My budget is set at $800 - enough to buy the Nikon if that's the one to get. I've read all of the threads and reviews I can find on these lenses, but you know how it goes. You never have enough information. I'd like to see some opinions and particularly to see some hi-res shots from any of the lenses. The Sigma 3.5 is significantly more expensive than the older 4-5.6, and I question whether or not that's really worth it. It's only a third stop faster at the wide end, and I'll usually be at 10-12mm. I will likely usually have a tripod and shoot f/8-f/11 anyway in low light conditions. At 10mm, I don't see f/4 being much of a problem for typical indoor shots. Is that a fair assumption?

Thanks in advance for any input. One of the biggest bonuses for the older Sigma is that I could add a 35 1.8 and still fall under budget.
Daily Shot
My Photographic Adventures

Nikon D7000 | 10-20 | 50 | 55-200

Comments

  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,079 moderator
    edited December 17, 2009
    I use the Sigma 10-20mm, f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM and I do tend to use it at middle apertures. It's more of a "spice" lens for me so it doesn't see constant use, but it does go pretty much everywhere I do (when I have a crop 1.6x kit).

    I haven't felt the need to upgrade yet.

    584919541_vQFmE-O.jpg

    258640093_M8DVn-O.jpg
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Jesse SJesse S Registered Users Posts: 13 Big grins
    edited December 18, 2009
    I have the older Sigma on a D40 and I love it. The extra stops would be nice, but like you said, it does pretty well in low light at 10mm. I find the sharpness to be excellent and surprisingly little chromatic aberrations at the edges.

    And instead of the 35 1.8, I'd recommend the Sigma 30 1.4 - a simply spectacular low light lens.

    704994505_rweFK-XL.jpg

    587211324_zAaqV-XL.jpg

    619365334_PcDF6-XL.jpg

    617685901_tq6eg-XL.jpg

    611359247_uyZoE-XL.jpg
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited December 18, 2009
    I have the Sigma 10-20 4/5.6. I have used it on my D40X and now use it on my D200. Get it, you'll love it. I don't find enough of a need for the faster 10-20 to upgrade.
  • CoryUTCoryUT Registered Users Posts: 367 Major grins
    edited December 18, 2009
    Thanks for the responses everyone. Really helpful. It's nice to see some shots of the Sigma/D40 combo as well. I'm sold, so now it's time to save up the monies for another toy :D

    I'll check out the 30 1.4, I hadn't even heard of it. Thanks for the suggestion.
    Daily Shot
    My Photographic Adventures

    Nikon D7000 | 10-20 | 50 | 55-200
Sign In or Register to comment.