Bald Eagles
Went out in hopes of capturing some eagle action. Most of the day was pretty ho-hum until a friend decided to eat his sandwich. The smell of the food must have made the eagles hungry. As soon as he started to eat, the eagles decided they wanted lunch too. I have yet to get a fishing image, but these will have to do for now. All are with my D3, 300 2.8, and TC20EII and are about 80% of the frame (yep, these birds were CLOSE).
This eagle took a fish coming right at us, but tree branches made any good shots of the action impossible.
#1
#2
#3
And what an AWESOME blue sky we had!!
#4
This eagle took a fish coming right at us, but tree branches made any good shots of the action impossible.
#1
#2
#3
And what an AWESOME blue sky we had!!
#4
0
Comments
Ron
http://ront.smugmug.com/
Nikon D600, Nikon 85 f/1.8G, Nikon 24-120mm f/4, Nikon 70-300, Nikon SB-700, Canon S95
Link to my Smugmug site
My Photo Gallery:Northern Focus Photography
I wish I was half the man that my dog thinks I am...
D40
18 - 55 kit lens
55- 200 VR kit lens
Lots of desires
My only nit with the images are the faint sharpening halos (its more obvious in 3&4).
Here's a link to some info from Fabs Forns on how to avoid those halos
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Thanks for the link Harry. If I processed them in Photoshop, I would have most definitely done this. However, I use NX2 for most of my processing now and I did "remove" my sharpening from the edges of the bird. I guess I had the opacity of my brush turned down a bit too much. I appreciate the information though, it's what I look for. Sometimes when you process a lot of images, your eyes don't "see" stuff that others can pick up on.
www.richknechtphotography.com
clap