Hallett Cove, South Australia

MazlimMazlim Registered Users Posts: 67 Big grins
edited February 8, 2010 in Landscapes
I've been a bit slack with my photography lately, so I made a New Year's Resolution to head out at least every fortnight for a shoot, and then actually process some photos from that shoot. I have a really bad habit of shooting and then not processing...

These two images were made after the sun had set. The first one was taken maybe 5 minutes after it had sunk below the horizon, and the second one was taken a little later, maybe about 15 minutes or so.

C&C is most welcome as I am still a little unsure of my post-processing techniques - especially concerning contrast and saturation. Do people prefer the more subdued natural look or an enhancement of natural colours?

Thanks in advance!
-Marianne

779214695_jMcqb-L.jpg

779213759_eVFRC-L.jpg

Comments

  • DsrtVWDsrtVW Registered Users Posts: 1,991 Major grins
    edited February 7, 2010
    I love the rocks and textures and colors. The light is good. Punching up the contrast and color is purely a matter of taste and what your are trying for in related the scene.
    I like the second one for the composition, it is hard to keep the moon(i am assuming that is the moon) in the range. If you would have had a grad neutral density filter it might have helped. What was you f stop?
    Chris K. NANPA Member
    http://kadvantage.smugmug.com/
  • dlsdls Registered Users Posts: 385 Major grins
    edited February 8, 2010
    very nicely done. rich in color, detail, tone, and texture. love the comp. in regards to saturation and contrast, i guess it is a matter of taste. in general, i tend to favor more subtle colors for photos representing a natural scene, unless the intention is to have a reinterpretation of the subject matter (akin to creating a surreal painting-like quality). i love your pictures as is.
  • MazlimMazlim Registered Users Posts: 67 Big grins
    edited February 8, 2010
    Thanks for the feedback, I like knowing what it is about an image that people find interesting.

    The f-stop on the first image was 16, and the second one was shot at f/22. And yes, that is the moon, which actually looked quite large, but doesn't tend to stay that way when shooting with a wide angle lens.

    I didn't exactly use a GND but I did move my hand over somewhere in the upper portion of the image to decrease the amount of light getting through (not really technical I know...)
  • thapamdthapamd Registered Users Posts: 1,722 Major grins
    edited February 8, 2010
    Beautiful! I love those rocks and how prominent they appear with the wide angle lens. Nice! :D
    Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap but memories are priceless.

    Mahesh
    http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
  • schmooschmoo Registered Users Posts: 8,468 Major grins
    edited February 8, 2010
    These are just beautiful! I don't think you need to be particularly worried about your processing, as you're obviously doing something right. thumb.gif
  • MazlimMazlim Registered Users Posts: 67 Big grins
    edited February 8, 2010
  • a110p0a110p0 Registered Users Posts: 257 Major grins
    edited February 8, 2010
    Would love to see more of your work posted. This set is
    terrific.

    Alvin
    Alvin
    Fremont, CA
    SmugMug Gallery
Sign In or Register to comment.