Boxing: 7D, iso 6400

SnapLocallySnapLocally Registered Users Posts: 185 Major grins
edited February 21, 2010 in Sports
I took these on Saturday, my 3rd boxing event this month so far using my 7D:

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg

7.jpg

8.jpg

There's even more pics here from this event: http://snaplocally.com/21310/angell

Comments

  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,940 moderator
    edited February 16, 2010
    Looks nice. Maybe a little bump for the colors?
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • SUMGUYSUMGUY Registered Users Posts: 61 Big grins
    edited February 16, 2010
    6400! I have been to scared to go past 1000 with a D300 untill yesterday, I shot at 2000. Do you know how much difference there is between the 7D and D300 in terms of noise?

    These look ok for such a high ISO. Are you still using the same lense off the 40D?

    cheers, Scott
  • SnapLocallySnapLocally Registered Users Posts: 185 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2010
    7D vs D300- As I may have mentioned before, a friend of mine is a D300 shooter, and I was always impressed on how clean his iso 3200 shots looked compared to my 40D. Compared to the D300... I just read in PopPhoto that the 7D produces less noise at 6400 than the D300s produces at iso 3200, and that the Canon -at iso 12,800- outresolved the D300s at iso 100, but they "deem the noise Unacceptable at that high sensitivity". As far as the actual D300 (without the "s") I'm not sure. I wouldn't be afraid to shoot at iso 3200 if I were you- if the shots are exposed properly it tends to minimize the noise.

    As far as my lenses go, yes, I still have the same line up. The 7D has the same 1.6x crop factor that the 40D has, so no "upgrades" were necessary.
  • chest2tankchest2tank Registered Users Posts: 61 Big grins
    edited February 16, 2010
    Holy moley! Where's all the noise?!? Great captures. Expressions are great, and you captured the action perfectly.

    Pretty please, change your accompanying font????
  • FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited February 16, 2010
    great captures.

    expression in the last shot mad me laugh, though. :)
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • KipCoxKipCox Registered Users Posts: 54 Big grins
    edited February 18, 2010
    Nice shots.

    From everything I've been told the 7D at that high of an ISO should be noisy, guess it depends on the shutter speed and light. Be interested to know what lens and setting you were using. I am seriously in the market for a "new" Canon body to replace my XSi and have been leaning towards a used 1D MKIII (the fames per sec and lack of issues related to buffering) rather than deal with the 7D's supposed noise.ne_nau.gif

    Agree with whoever asked about the color...little flat but some love in LR could take care of that.mwink.gif
  • EZPZEZPZ Registered Users Posts: 79 Big grins
    edited February 19, 2010
    I took these on Saturday, my 3rd boxing event this month so far using my 7D:

    There's even more pics here from this event: http://snaplocally.com/21310/angell

    Well done. Number 1 is a great shot. No flash? Even better.
  • SnapLocallySnapLocally Registered Users Posts: 185 Major grins
    edited February 19, 2010
    KC- I was using a used Sigma prime.

    As far as I'm concerned the only iso that has "noise issues" is 12,800, and even then the shots have detail and are quite usable with a little noise reduction in pp.

    "Flat colors"- I suppose I could bump up the saturation a bit, but I'd rather not embellish on the colors considering the environment I was shooting in. Part of the trade off in shooting at higher iso's is the fact that there wasn't a whole lot of light to begin with, and as such there's going to be less contrast and duller colors. That, and it would also "enhance" the brightly lit background even more so, detracting from the main focus of the shots -the action- even further.

    By contrast, here's a well lit venue shot at iso 2000:

    IMG_7728.jpg

    17.jpg

    7.jpg
  • KipCoxKipCox Registered Users Posts: 54 Big grins
    edited February 20, 2010
    17.jpg

    Love the spray on this one. What were the shutter, ISO, and f-stop on this one? I shoot hockey at 1/800, 1600, f3.5 and usually still a half-stop to stop underexposed and real grainy with my 450D. Not comparing that camera to your 7D results, just trying to determine if a 7D would be good enough for my immediate purposes versus getting a lightly used 1DMKIII.
  • KipCoxKipCox Registered Users Posts: 54 Big grins
    edited February 21, 2010
    BTW...how is the 7D in saving pics to card? My 450D gets about 3 or 4 pics then starts buffering like a maddog then 1 pic every half second or second.

    I shoot RAW versus JPEG because I got to have the lossless editing capability because of the noise at the 1600 range. I listened to someone with a MKIII and they were happily taking pics while I was watching a red light blink and skaters skating out of my end of the ice. eek7.gif
  • SnapLocallySnapLocally Registered Users Posts: 185 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2010
    Off hand I recall that last shot was taken at iso 2000 shutter probably around 1/500 at f/2.8...

    The 7D has a huge amount of wiggle room before I even scratched the surface of buffering. *But* I am also not a RAW shooter. According to the manual, one can take 15 shots at 8fps or 24 shots at 10mp size before it becomes an issue.
Sign In or Register to comment.