Acadia Revisited
dlplumer
Registered Users Posts: 8,081 Major grins
Still have more to process, and with Aperture 3, I am motivated.
0
Comments
Is it an HDR then processed in Aperture? Or just a single exposure in Aperture?
SmugMug QA
My Photos
Thanks Chris.
3 exposures processed in Photomatix, then Aperture.
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
www.everlookphotography.com
Thanks cj. I replaced the original with a fixed version
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Much better! great shot!
http://tjdphoto.wordpress.com/
Thanks very much:D
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Thanks Maz.
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
My Photo Gallery:Northern Focus Photography
I wish I was half the man that my dog thinks I am...
Cheers,
My Website | My Blog | My Facebook Page | My YouTube
Mahesh
http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
Jerry
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Totally belies the universally-bemoaned state of A3!
Thanks much W, but what is A3?
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
I love A3. It has some bugs, but once you know how to use it, they pretty much go away, and I am sure Apple will release some stability updates. Do you use it?
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Then, when v1.5 provided the option to reference my image files where I put them, I bought it and began using it. It was fantastic. However, when (a little later - v1.6?) I began to use the new spot tool, bizarre performance issues and problems arose. At that stage my Mac desktop was the fastest computer Apple had ever made. I persevered as long as I could but Apple was obviously unwilling to fix, or even concede they had, a problem. I had been using the Lightroom beta from its very first release, so bought LR 1.0 the day it came out and turned my back on Aperture.
My experience with LR has been excellent, even though Adobe is more than a little cute with its so-called public beta nonsense. With LR beta 3 going through its present tedious process, and then A3 being released (and having been rumoured to have been completely rewritten in 2.0 to overcome my previous performance concerns with 1.X), I began to wonder whether this was the time to check it out again.
However, reading the plethora of user discontent with A3 performance within days of release and no response (even acknowledgement) from Apple, I see my previous experience being repeated for a whole new generation of Aperture users. I'm a Mac user from the mid-80s so I'm a believer, but this is nuts.
I haven't downloaded the A3 trial so I don't start the 30 days period running - just in case Apple delivers a fix which I then can't trial. However, I'll definitely be buying and using LR3 when it is (finally) released. By then the door may have closed on Aperture for me for ever.
1. Re-process old A2 photos only one at a time when you need to.
2. Disable Face detection when processing/editing photos
3. Use selective brushes sparingly and slowly (allow the machine to finish processing before you use another brush).
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
OK - dumb question of the day. How do I turn off / disable Face detection? Other than that slowing things down, so far I'm very happy with A3
http://www.imagesbyceci.com
http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
Picadilly, NB, Canada
Go to: preferences under the Aperture pull down menu, then select general and unclick disable faces
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
http://www.imagesbyceci.com
http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
Picadilly, NB, Canada
Lots of great A3 tips and tricks on MacCreate.com
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page