First Time
Here is a few from my first time shooting my Wife at the park. I have not done alot of people photography:scratch but I really want to learn. So tell me what you think!! I am sure there are a ton of "Don't Do's" Let me have it and help me learn. Thanks
2
3
2
3
D90, D40, SB-600, SB-400, 50mm 1.8 and a couple of kit lenes.:thumb
0
Comments
www.chriscopelandphotography.com
www.facebook.com/chriscopelandphotofanpage
As for the picture with the bench, I'm not entirely sure about the tilt, in that the dynamic it could convey doesn't necessarily fit the picture? I'm thinking here about Freeman's book, that has a page or two on placement of a park bench in the frame, and what it conveys. If you haven't got that book, I can recommend it. It's not always easy, but my composition skills fast improving by studying this book.
Disappointed with AF of Tamron 28-75 2.8, me less happy.
CCPhoto, I have to agree this place is top notch. That is one of the main reasons that I come here and lurk so much. I am pretty sure I have learned more here than anywhere else on the net!!:)
Agree about the "feel" of these. Since you don't say so, I'm assuming these are maternity. She doesn't look real happy about having a baby. I've seen a lot of "sad" maternity shots, and I guess I just don't get it...
OK. On to the photos themselves...
1) You chopped the top of her head off. Watch that. Also, you've got a pole from the swingset on the bottom-right. The way the vignette is, it's running right through her head - making the focus of the picture the belly - which may be the point. But, typically, you want the face to be the focal point. So - being the Maternity thing, the belly and face need to share the focus. I think I keep coming back to "I'd like to see some eye contact." I like the pp.
2) It seems she's slouching a little bit. She just doesn't look comfortable to me. I think what bugs me about the bench is not so much the tilt, but that so much of the bench is missing. I think in this case it would make the image much stronger to see the whole thing.
3) The olive tone to the picture doesn't do anything for me. The PP makes it seem underexposed. There's some interaction with the eyes, but they are missing life. A reflector or a strobe camera left would lighten up the eyes a bit and put a little catchlight in them - which would help them come alive. Also, there's a part of me that's wondering if you need a bit more tree in this shot. There's more tree in the bottom of the frame, which is fine, but by the time you get to the top, it's only a sliver. That's a bit distracting to me. I'd like to see a bit more to make it seem a bit more intentional.
By the way - you can straighten in Lightroom...
Hope that is helpful. I'm no expert, but I've found that details help.
Thanks for posting!
Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular.
Why do people post their equipment in their sig. Isn't it kind of like bragging? That having been said...
Canon 40d Gripped (x2), Rebel (Original), Canon 70-200 f/2.8 USM L, Canon 300 f/4, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, Canon 50mm f/1.8, Canon 17-55 f/3.5-5.6, ThinkTank Airport TakeOff
My Site
Proud Photog for The Littlest Heroes Project and Operation: LoveReunited
Lovin' my Canon 5D Mark II!