Angel Eyes

TuesdayTuesday Registered Users Posts: 52 Big grins
edited January 20, 2004 in The Dgrin Challenges
My neice Madison.
Also known as Punkin
5 yrs. old.
:tuesday

10.jpg

Comments

  • cmr164cmr164 Registered Users Posts: 1,542 Major grins
    edited January 19, 2004
    Tuesday wrote:
    My neice Madison.
    Also known as Punkin
    5 yrs. old.
    :tuesday
    I know it is a style thing but I would like to see more flesh tone. Part of her cheek is blown out (so white there is no residual color) so without doing some brush work this is what I came up with. It isn't really what I want but maybe i would suggest that you expose 1 or maybe 2 EV less.
    Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
    Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
    Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
  • TuesdayTuesday Registered Users Posts: 52 Big grins
    edited January 19, 2004
    cmr164 wrote:
    I know it is a style thing but I would like to see more flesh tone. Part of her cheek is blown out (so white there is no residual color) so without doing some brush work this is what I came up with. It isn't really what I want but maybe i would suggest that you expose 1 or maybe 2 EV less.
    Well, the original had some "lighting issues" so I played around with it.
    I thought it looked "angelic".
    I know what you mean though.
    :tuesday
  • cmr164cmr164 Registered Users Posts: 1,542 Major grins
    edited January 19, 2004
    Tuesday wrote:
    Well, the original had some "lighting issues" so I played around with it.
    I thought it looked "angelic".
    I know what you mean though.
    :tuesday
    It is a really good picture and it is a style thing. I just figure if you exposed 1 or 2 ev darker, then no part of her face would be blown even if you did lighten it in Photoshop to get your angelic look.
    Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
    Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
    Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
  • wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited January 19, 2004
    She's a beaut. Adorable shot. I like how you, um, solved your problem. :D
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited January 19, 2004
    wxwax wrote:
    She's a beaut. Adorable shot. I like how you, um, solved your problem. :D
    I like the increase in tonality too - BUT - it is no fair to repost someone else'e picture without telling in detail how you processed it - that helps us all learn and be better to evalute the changes.

    Pathfinder
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • cmr164cmr164 Registered Users Posts: 1,542 Major grins
    edited January 20, 2004
    pathfinder wrote:
    I like the increase in tonality too - BUT - it is no fair to repost someone else'e picture without telling in detail how you processed it - that helps us all learn and be better to evalute the changes.

    Pathfinder
    If you are talking about my changes... Using 'xv' I applied a gamma of .5 and increased saturation a little.
    Charles Richmond IT & Security Consultant
    Operating System Design, Drivers, Software
    Villa Del Rio II, Talamban, Pit-os, Cebu, Ph
  • FleasFleas Registered Users Posts: 38 Big grins
    edited January 20, 2004
    wxwax wrote:
    She's a beaut. Adorable shot. I like how you, um, solved your problem. :D
    I agree, she is a cutie..
Sign In or Register to comment.