NY Times: 'For photographers, the image of a shrinking path'

The_Fat_ZebraThe_Fat_Zebra Registered Users Posts: 120 Major grins
edited March 30, 2010 in Mind Your Own Business
Interesting read in the New York Times, but no doubt it's but a confirmation of what you already know: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/media/30photogs.html?src=me&ref=general
Street & Portrait because of the people. Landscape because it's pretty.
Disappointed with AF of Tamron 28-75 2.8, me less happy.

Comments

  • CardenCarden Registered Users Posts: 120 Major grins
    edited March 30, 2010
    Interesting read in the New York Times, but no doubt it's but a confirmation of what you already know:

    You beat me to it. I just read the article. I believe we have discussed something similar before on Dgrin. Digital cameras, immediate gratification, part-time employment & some creative potential.
    These are all things that will/have affected those of us who have been making a living in this business. We just need to be more creative in both our presentation and business sense!
  • SnowgirlSnowgirl Registered Users Posts: 2,155 Major grins
    edited March 30, 2010
    Carden wrote:
    We just need to be more creative in both our presentation and business sense!

    Uh huh! Exactly the premise in John Harrington's book - Best Business Practices for Photographers - essentially a must read if anyone expects to survive financially in this world - in ANY business.:ivar
    Creating visual and verbal images that resonate with you.
    http://www.imagesbyceci.com
    http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
    Picadilly, NB, Canada
Sign In or Register to comment.