Panning and IS - to use or not

mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
edited April 4, 2010 in Sports
There is absolutely no benefit to using IS for panning... not even in Mode 3, 4, or 5.
This was a direct quote from another forum made by a very talented motorsports photographer whom I have great respect for. He will routinely pan with racing cars at shutter speeds as low as 1/15 of a second. And while I always thought Canon's IS Mode 2 was specifically for panning (indeed, that is how it is marketed) I'm now wondering if I should just stop using image stabilization entirely. Thoughts from this crowd?
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu

Comments

  • zoomerzoomer Registered Users Posts: 3,688 Major grins
    edited April 2, 2010
    If I have a high shutter speed I don't use it. (Nikon)
    If I have a marginally slow shutter speed and I am tracking a consistently horizontal object like a bird I do use it...but have to be able to track for a couple seconds to really get any benefit from it.
  • BCSPhotoguyBCSPhotoguy Registered Users Posts: 265 Major grins
    edited April 2, 2010
    I think it comes down to your own balance and nerves! I myself love the VR on my Nikon Lens! I was able to drop the shutter much lower than with previous lenses. But, i have a friend of must have nerves of steel - he is able to pan near the same speeds without it. Larger lenses - definate must!

    Do a test - next time at the track set the shutter to 1/50th or so and try it with and without the IS on. See what you think.
    _________________________________
    Nikon D3 & D3s
    2xSB-900 Speedlights
    Tokina 12-24 f4, Nikon 50 f1.8, 28-70 f2.8,70-200 f2.8 VR, 1.7x TC , 200-400 f4 vrII
    ...more to come!
  • nw scoutnw scout Registered Users Posts: 256 Major grins
    edited April 3, 2010
    mercphoto wrote:
    This was a direct quote from another forum made by a very talented motorsports photographer whom I have great respect for. He will routinely pan with racing cars at shutter speeds as low as 1/15 of a second. And while I always thought Canon's IS Mode 2 was specifically for panning (indeed, that is how it is marketed) I'm now wondering if I should just stop using image stabilization entirely. Thoughts from this crowd?

    Could you post the thread this came from.

    I, as personal preference, dont use the IS mode. I actually stay away from the IS lenses when I have the choice. I dont feel they are as sharp and seem to affect the autofocus a bit.
  • nosmonosmo Registered Users Posts: 60 Big grins
    edited April 3, 2010
    When I shot some MX a few weekends back I tried mode 1, mode 2 and no IS. Mode 2 seemed to work well IF the subject was moving in straight line perpendicular to me, mode 1 seemed to work best in every other situation, with no IS, my shutter speed needed to be higher than I was trying for - but my panning technique is still in need of lots more practice.

    IS can and does help get the shot, and many people have the skills to get the shot without IS. I think the more proficient you get, the less you need it.
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,940 moderator
    edited April 4, 2010
    I feel I get a better keeper rate with it off.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • ToshidoToshido Registered Users Posts: 759 Major grins
    edited April 4, 2010
    Probably not the best move but I always have IS on when handholding. Mode 2 for panning.

    This shot was taken at 120mm 1/60 shutter speed with IS on in mode 2. I shot the entire airshow with shutter speeds of 1/50-1/60 of a second. I was happy with the results.

    784681542_tW93W-M.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.