D90 Problem?

Allan FGAllan FG Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
edited April 14, 2010 in Cameras
I was shooting a desert motorcycle race today and I'm noticing some of my shots have a very different exposure even though the EXIF reads the same for 2 images shot in the same second.

Both of these read as 1/200th F13 ISO 200, they are of the same rider and you can see that they were taken in the same second. The shot right after these two has good exposure. I haven't seen this behavior before and I would be interested if anyone else has seen this before.

834303353_apoMY-XL.jpg

834303257_hrGnq-XL.jpg

Comments

  • angevin1angevin1 Registered Users Posts: 3,403 Major grins
    edited April 12, 2010
    Considering the left side of the 2nd photo is lighter, it looks like a bit of Shutter lag.
    tom wise
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,131 moderator
    edited April 12, 2010
    As Tom noted I am a bit concerned about the "uneven" exposure. It does look like a shutter mechanism issue.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Rob_WRob_W Registered Users Posts: 17 Big grins
    edited April 12, 2010
    Did you have Vr turned on ?, if your shooting continuously with Vr
    switched on it can cause weird effects with the shutter.
  • Allan FGAllan FG Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
    edited April 12, 2010
    Rob_W wrote:
    Did you have Vr turned on ?, if your shooting continuously with Vr
    switched on it can cause weird effects with the shutter.

    I did have VR turned on, I have never seen this behavior before and I have shot heavy with VR turned on before. I'm wondering if a good cleaning would help, couldn't hurt.
  • Allan FGAllan FG Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
    edited April 12, 2010
    Well I think it has to do with shooting RAW, I filled one card with RAW images and then I switched to a smaller card so I also switched the camera to JPEG, I didn't see any of these type of images with the JPEG images. I think I was just overloading the camera.
  • Rob_WRob_W Registered Users Posts: 17 Big grins
    edited April 13, 2010
    What speed SD card did you have in ?.
  • Rob_WRob_W Registered Users Posts: 17 Big grins
    edited April 14, 2010
    At 6mb/s transfer speed its probably your card slowing things up, shooting in
    Raw your transfering a lot of data to the card and when shooting continuously
    it has to transfer very quickly.

    I use Scandisk Extreme III Cards, they have 30mb/s transfer speed which are
    a lot quicker than the ones your using. They are a bit pricey but speed is
    never cheap i'm afraid.

    If it was the shutter sticking or needed cleaning i think it would show up a
    lot worse than that, it does look more a processing problem...


    .
  • Rob_WRob_W Registered Users Posts: 17 Big grins
    edited April 14, 2010
    I just noticed one of the reviews on the amazon site...
    Bought to replace my broken class 6 card for my D90. There is a noticeable difference in speed especially when shooting burst. With class 6 I could fire off about 13-15 shots until the buffer ran out but with this one, I can keep shooting continuously. Great speed and with 8gb it has plenty of space for any situation.

    Looks like thats your answer and on a D90 as well...
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,131 moderator
    edited April 14, 2010
    A memory card can impact on transfer speed and "occasionally" you will hear of the high frequency electronics of the camera internals affecting image quality via poorly shielded memory card, but that will be in the form of a repetitive "noise"; either banding or a noise that looks almost like sensor noise.

    A card should have no impact on overall exposure, as I see in the second image. All modern cameras buffer the image internally before transferring the image to the memory card. The exposure is completely formed before the image is stored onto the card.

    If the problem persists I suggest that camera repairs are likely needed.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Allan FGAllan FG Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
    edited April 14, 2010
    Well I will do some testing and see what I can figure out. Thanks for all the replies.
  • Rob_WRob_W Registered Users Posts: 17 Big grins
    edited April 14, 2010
    Fair enough, i'll go along with that but why then does it only do it in raw?.
    Once the exposure is completely formed its transfered to the card, the
    only difference writing to the card is the size of the file and the maximum
    transfer rate of the card.

    It may well be a trait of a D90 when the buffer is full. It would be interesting
    to put a fast card in and see if it still occured...
Sign In or Register to comment.