Bumble bee feeding

Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
edited April 17, 2010 in Holy Macro
Some shots of a bumble bee feeding on a mauve azalea flower. Had dreadful trouble with the exposures with the flower parts overexposing and the bee underexposing but tried rescuing them as much as possible during RAW conversion and PP.

Brian v.

4525358242_be24568258_o.jpg

4525358244_c24d6a2e31_o.jpg

4525358246_38a1ef15da_o.jpg

4525358248_38a1ef15da_o.jpg

Comments

  • alexfalexf Registered Users Posts: 436 Major grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    Very nice! I like #3 best.

    PS: It is best to number pictures when posting more than three, for easier reference.
    AlexFeldsteinPhotography.com
    Nikon D700, D300, D80 and assorted glass, old and new.
  • Wicked_DarkWicked_Dark Registered Users Posts: 1,138 Major grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    Good rescues. I can see the 'tongue' is split which I never knew about bees.
  • paddler4paddler4 Registered Users Posts: 976 Major grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    Very nice. I like the last best. Was it the red channel that was blown out? I have had that problem with red flowers a lot, and I recently read that the problem is that camera sensors are sensitive to IR that we can't see.
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2010
    Thanks for the comments :)

    Paddler the main problem was the bee hanging under the flower with no background, even though I used negative FEC on the flash, the flash angle really lit up the top petal and flower parts so I had to set the exposure in RAW to -1 stop and then bring it back up with curves.
    Yes I also get the same problem often with the red channel esp with flowers. Have found putting the picture style to neutral from standard in the RAW converter and sometimes with a little saturation reduction I can often control this.

    Brian v.
Sign In or Register to comment.