Question about Nikon CLS- Off camera flash

lilmommalilmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,060 Major grins
edited April 26, 2010 in Accessories
I'm curious if anyone knows the approximate indoor reach that the nikon CLS system has. I have sb600's and I have a wedding coming up and would like to stick my flashes off camera at the reception. But I was wondering if I need to be within like 5-10 feet of it at all times or if I have some room to move around. If I don't have much room then I need to invest in something to fire it that will give me more room. although I really hate to do that and defeat the purpose of the CLS. any insight is appreciated. thanks :)

Comments

  • Sil3ntp8nd8Sil3ntp8nd8 Registered Users Posts: 42 Big grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    First off, you really need 2.8 for weddings but thats a different story.

    But CLS works best for me at home (studio), as the range is always within 10 feet. At a hall, you will find that CLS won't work best as well as outdoors.

    The cheapest option would be getting YongNuo flash triggers as I have 4 of them for my nikon flashes. You can try to use CLS but from my experience it won't work well.
  • zoomerzoomer Registered Users Posts: 3,688 Major grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    It actually reaches pretty well.
    I shoot at 20-30 feet outdoors with it all the time no problem and at least that much indoors, I have never actually set it up indoors where it didn't work, give it a try.

    Remember you need line of sight for best results, sometimes indoors you can fudge that a bit because the light bounces around and sometimes the sensor will still get the signal.

    I use the sb800, hopefully the sb600 is the same.
  • ZerodogZerodog Registered Users Posts: 1,480 Major grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    It is pretty far. I did a picture in a cave a while ago and I bet I was 60-80 ft from the flash? I would go test it. It might really surprise you.
  • lilmommalilmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,060 Major grins
    edited April 16, 2010
    Sil3ntp8nd8- thanks for your reply. I actually have a 1.8 and 2.8, both primes though, and the wedding i'm shooting is for the photographer I second shoot for all the time so he is well aware of my gear and capabilities. If all else fails I'll put the flash on camera and bounce or use modifiers. thumb.gif

    Zoomer and Zerodog- thanks for your replies as well. I don't think the place is huge or anything, but just wanted to know what some others experiences have been. i'm glad to know the reach has been fairly decent for you. I'm pretty sure it will work but i'll be testing it out before hand of course. Thanks :D
  • angevin1angevin1 Registered Users Posts: 3,403 Major grins
    edited April 17, 2010
    lilmomma wrote:
    Sil3ntp8nd8- thanks for your reply. I actually have a 1.8 and 2.8, both primes though, and the wedding i'm shooting is for the photographer I second shoot for all the time so he is well aware of my gear and capabilities. If all else fails I'll put the flash on camera and bounce or use modifiers. thumb.gif

    Zoomer and Zerodog- thanks for your replies as well. I don't think the place is huge or anything, but just wanted to know what some others experiences have been. i'm glad to know the reach has been fairly decent for you. I'm pretty sure it will work but i'll be testing it out before hand of course. Thanks :D

    I've used ( and Blabbed) about using these flash combo's via the CLS for two+ years now.

    The line of sight reach out of doors is +/- 98ft. they can reach further, but not reliably. Or turn more than 30 degrees away from them at this distance and they will miss the fire signal. Closer, say 50ft and you can turn 45 degrees either way and fire fine.

    Indoors I have used them high/low and far. The nice thing about inside is, the signals have walls to bounce from. So if you have a large room even the ones on the other side and behind you will fire if shooting away from them.

    The thing to note is you cannot light a big room without having a bank of them : say a 60ft by 30ft room, you might need as many as eight flashes to really light it up. Also, drapes and plants and anything that can disrupt the signal will basically split the signal up and make it die before it reaches it's intended target. Using the IR signal as many of us like to do requires you to use it like a pool player having a clear bounce area to bounce from/to.


    Talking technique, I assume you already have a technique that you like, though you're asking about these so perhaps you are trying a new technique. There are so very many ways to light a particular scene, sometimes being all lit up ends up not looking as dramatic as being spot lit for a particular photo op.

    HTH~
    tom wise
  • DeaconDeacon Registered Users Posts: 239 Major grins
    edited April 19, 2010
    You will be surprised
    I use a SB900 and 2 SB800's for shooting large spaces. The 900 is on camera with the 2 SB800's mounted to spring clamps for easy positioning and there are lots of things you can clamp to. Line of sight is certainly the most reliable positioning for shots but I find that bounced IR works pretty well as shown below:

    723356426_o92gT-XL-2.jpg

    If you can get into the space ahead of time you will be ahead of the game to try some exposures and positioning.

    Good Luck

    Deacon
  • sweet carolinesweet caroline Registered Users Posts: 1,589 Major grins
    edited April 19, 2010
    I've used mine from pretty far away, as well. Line of sight is more of an issue than distance.

    Caroline
  • Wil DavisWil Davis Registered Users Posts: 1,692 Major grins
    edited April 19, 2010
    554904186_K8CoY-L-2.jpg

    This was a panorama (five or six shots) with an SB600 on the camera, and an SB800 just in front of the far balustrade. You'll see that the basses along the far wall picked up the flash from the SB800 (just a bit). The distance between the flash heads was at least 20 feet, and they were not in direct line of sight.

    HTH -

    - Wil
    "…………………" - Marcel Marceau
  • insanefredinsanefred Registered Users Posts: 604 Major grins
    edited April 20, 2010
    CLS works wonders, as long as you don't use the on-camera flash as your commander. A SB-900 is simply superior, if you use one, you'll find that you can get away with a lot more.
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited April 20, 2010
    insanefred wrote:
    CLS works wonders, as long as you don't use the on-camera flash as your commander. A SB-900 is simply superior, if you use one, you'll find that you can get away with a lot more.

    That may be but then it seems you are wasting a very
    expensive asset....headscratch.gifne_nau.gifeek7.gif
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • insanefredinsanefred Registered Users Posts: 604 Major grins
    edited April 20, 2010
    Art Scott wrote:
    That may be but then it seems you are wasting a very
    expensive asset....headscratch.gifne_nau.gifeek7.gif

    Wasting an asset is to not be able to use off camera flash the way you want it to in tricky scenarios.

    best example that I feel like writing at the moment:
    I am taking a photo of someone looking out the window in front of me, she is about 10 -15' from me, there is a door open next to me. It is a bright sunny day, but it's just shade outside the door and window.
    set up a light stand with a SB-600 right outside the window and I baffle the window.
    Unable to get a reliably set off the sb-600 with my on board flash. Instead I use the SB-900 as a commander, set it to 200mm zoom and point it directly at the 600. I am able to trigger the 600 with worry.
  • MitchellMitchell Registered Users Posts: 3,503 Major grins
    edited April 21, 2010
    insanefred wrote:
    CLS works wonders, as long as you don't use the on-camera flash as your commander. A SB-900 is simply superior, if you use one, you'll find that you can get away with a lot more.

    I agree with this. I've had much more consistent results with multiple flashes firing using my SU-800 as my commander instead of the on camera flash as commander. I suspect the SU-800 (and SB800 and SB900) send out a much broader IR signal.
  • lilmommalilmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,060 Major grins
    edited April 23, 2010
    thanks for the input guys! Yeah I can see how a sb900 would give a farther range...but grrr...unfortunately don't have 400 or so dollars to spare, and the wedding is tomorrow. I'll work it out regardless, and watch for a post tomorrow night/sunday morning in the weddings forum with the results thumb.gif
  • SurfdogSurfdog Registered Users Posts: 297 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2010
    While you guys are on this discussion, have you experienced problems with the CLS system not working around PA systems or sound systems? I have run into problems at wedding receptions where there are bands or Dj's playing. I use my SB-800's on D700's with flash brackets. Last evening, both flashes on both cameras quit firing at the same time once the music started. There has to be some connection.
    ne_nau.gif
    http://www.dvivianphoto.com

    Don't worry. I can fix you in photoshop.
  • angevin1angevin1 Registered Users Posts: 3,403 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2010
    Surfdog wrote:
    While you guys are on this discussion, have you experienced problems with the CLS system not working around PA systems or sound systems? I have run into problems at wedding receptions where there are bands or Dj's playing. I use my SB-800's on D700's with flash brackets. Last evening, both flashes on both cameras quit firing at the same time once the music started. There has to be some connection.
    ne_nau.gif
    I read your mention of this in your other thread seeking triggers, and found it interesting and remarkable. I haven't experienced it at all. The times I remember live bands playing, I had a SB800 as commander, instead on the on cam flash~

    If it were just one flash I could find a better reason for the failure, but with both, you gotta say it must've been the music.

    And why music? I suspect that something the Band was using interrupted the electromagnetic field and interrupted your IR signal to your flashes. I do wonder what it was they were using that could have done this? Perhaps they were sending signals to speakers for control of some aspect, or just to float the sound signal on top of a lightwave?

    ??no help from me, but lots of questions~
    tom wise
Sign In or Register to comment.