What is "lo-fi"
Flyinggina
Registered Users Posts: 2,639 Major grins
The question of what constitutes lo-fi has been coming up a lot so I thought that it might be fun to discuss it in a thread for the purpose.
I'll start with sharing my thoughts.
It seems that it has to be something more than sooc - where you make whatever adjustments you camera allows to get the result you want. Otherwise, this would be a straightforward sooc challenge. I can see an argument, though, that relying on your DSLR for a finished jpeg photo is lo-fi. It sure is if you are used to shooting raw and making adjustments in post.
One interpretation seems to be that lo-fi means that the picture has to be soft, oof, under or over exposed, faded, overly saturated etc. - something that we might find in a box of old family or vacation photos from the 60's. Nostalgic. Vintage.
I'm think that another interpretation is a photo made by using a lo-fi means. This allows for photographs where the subject (or part of the subject) is in sharp focus. Or others (like the drive by pix I have posted) resulting from moving the camera. Or the use of a plastic lid to make a vingnette. Or causing a background blur with plastic or vaseline. Etc.
Also, since lensbabies are specifically allowed, I'm wondering if just using one is "lo-fi" for purposes of the challenge? If yes, then the final effect (however, it is achieved) is part of the definition of "lo-fi."
I'm beginning to feel as though I am trying to figure out how many angels can fit on the head of a pin. :scratch
Virginia
I'll start with sharing my thoughts.
It seems that it has to be something more than sooc - where you make whatever adjustments you camera allows to get the result you want. Otherwise, this would be a straightforward sooc challenge. I can see an argument, though, that relying on your DSLR for a finished jpeg photo is lo-fi. It sure is if you are used to shooting raw and making adjustments in post.
One interpretation seems to be that lo-fi means that the picture has to be soft, oof, under or over exposed, faded, overly saturated etc. - something that we might find in a box of old family or vacation photos from the 60's. Nostalgic. Vintage.
I'm think that another interpretation is a photo made by using a lo-fi means. This allows for photographs where the subject (or part of the subject) is in sharp focus. Or others (like the drive by pix I have posted) resulting from moving the camera. Or the use of a plastic lid to make a vingnette. Or causing a background blur with plastic or vaseline. Etc.
Also, since lensbabies are specifically allowed, I'm wondering if just using one is "lo-fi" for purposes of the challenge? If yes, then the final effect (however, it is achieved) is part of the definition of "lo-fi."
I'm beginning to feel as though I am trying to figure out how many angels can fit on the head of a pin. :scratch
Virginia
_______________________________________________
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
0
Comments
Now this part made me smile. Lo-Fi is everything you described and more. This challenge specifically was designed only as a starting point or launch pad to exploration outside of the worry about if something is perfect. Photography for me is a way to express creative energy. That energy should not have boundaries, it should take on many forms. To give a challenge that says shoot a carrot is too narrow so the hope is to ignite a spark and watch that spark grow into a flame. At the same time without some guidelines the whole forest would burn down.
Simply, Lo-Fi was an easy way to encapsulate the description of many forms of free expressive photography, from TTV to pinhole to many more things that I have seen being invented in the last two weeks.
Now go capture some images of angels on a pin
According to wikipedia...
The challenge here is to try and mimic this effect using our dSLRs, and without any post-processing.
And I think, further, the challenge for me was to do this, and still come up with something I'd like to have a print of.
ackdoc.com
I'd say that Lo-Fi is the Punk Rock of Photography…
…there's nothing wrong with it, it's just another interpretation.
It's certainly another way of looking at things…
- Wil
Don
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook .
…or the bottom of a Coke bottle
- Wil
on this page: http://donricklin.smugmug.com/Other/The-Fun-Stuff/4395926_M8y35#621214503_xPMVb ?
Don
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook .
Oh my!! Now that would be really lo-fi -
I do hope it didn't happen to you.
I just checked your entry. Looks like it did.
Sorry about your p&s.
Great capture though. Anything for our art, right?
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
And that probably would have been a enough to effect a launch... Sometimes less is better.
I do the discovery thing practically every challenge I enter into, and typically without much fanfare...and though there may be multiple reasons behind the result, it was/is the journey afterall~
I have thought and thought and thought some more about what to try.
I tried several things before finally just entered something.
It seems this is an exercise to get us all to think outside our comfort zone.
I just gave a quick look to see what the entries were like and it's so fun to see how
many different ideas everyone comes up with. It has definitely has been a fun and interesting challenge.
Good luck everyone.
Peace, gail
...well I did exaggerate about drinking the tall draft but I did use a tall draft glass and my p&s did stop working. I have cleaned it the best I can and got it working today...but the motor on the lens is giving out unfortunately. Caused from using a cheap underwater plastic bag housing for when I went to the Caribbean. It still doesn't focus well.