Do you ever worry about overstylizing your shots?
I am not talking about funky post processing. I am talking about capturing a quality or scene that wasn't "really" there at the wedding or between the couple...as if you are manufacturing a moment for the sake of capturing a beautiful frame.
I know it's kind of weird question. Maybe the PJ stylists maybe less prone to this. It's delicate line...you have style and a job to create a beautiful story out of the day and your client picked you based on your style and poortfolio. But can you go over the top with an image(s) artisitically even though you and your client is happy with the capture? heh.
Sometimes I see beautiful beautiful wedding images but I don't know if those images are truly reflective of the couple or the day. heh, I am not sure if I am getting my point across in a clear manner.
Maybe another way to put it..can a photographers ego or hubris "get in the way" of his photography..ie getting "portfolio" shot at the cost of capturing reality?
I know it's kind of weird question. Maybe the PJ stylists maybe less prone to this. It's delicate line...you have style and a job to create a beautiful story out of the day and your client picked you based on your style and poortfolio. But can you go over the top with an image(s) artisitically even though you and your client is happy with the capture? heh.
Sometimes I see beautiful beautiful wedding images but I don't know if those images are truly reflective of the couple or the day. heh, I am not sure if I am getting my point across in a clear manner.
Maybe another way to put it..can a photographers ego or hubris "get in the way" of his photography..ie getting "portfolio" shot at the cost of capturing reality?
D700, D600
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
0
Comments
However, If I have a couple who aren't "beach people" and we're near a beach I'll get them on the beach. Who wouldn't want that? If we go there even just for photos, it is still part of their wedding day.
Matt
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
That having been said, taking photographs is a two way street for me. It's as much about using a camera as reading your clients. Thankfully, after seeing my portfolio, my clients have a lot of trust with my vision.
I always try to get a couple fairy tale shots in there somewhere.
I feel the need to challenge myself artistically every shoot.
If I were just there to record the events that would be pretty boring to me.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Luckily, I don't need to do all that in one shot. The thing is, the photos that photographers put on their blogs and in their portfolio are usually going to be the really artistic, stylized shots (whether they are set up or not is really a different matter). However, if you looked at the entire set of delivered photos from the wedding, I'm sure you would find plenty of shots that serve as a more literal record of the day. The thing about those shots, though, is that they're usually much more interesting to the B&G and the guests than they are to random visitors to the photographer's website. Hence, they don't get put on display nearly as often.
http://blog.timkphotography.com