But being the musician's wife, I can't help but love #2 - if for any reason at all because there's a melodica in that picture (Honey, are you reading this?). Those little guys pop up in the weirdest places.
I agree with the comment about posting them in PJ, they're all very candid yet still stunning.
Is it just me or am I the only one that can't figure out what's going on in #1, how is he upside down?
I'm doing this as a series for Photo School. I have to pick 12 and I want to present them as a day at the park from morning to evening. Still have to do a night shot
I went back to the park today and took my 135mm.
9
10
11
12
13
14 Yes, that's the same guy in the same position as a few days back.
I think I'm going to crop off a bit of the right and the top of this photo.
Btw, my 135mm is a 40 year old 135mm f2.8 Revuenon-Special that I have for my Pentax SP1000.
I screwed it on my 350D using an M42-EOS adapter. So nothing works anymore I'm shooting on Av and focus manually.
A few are interesting. But all share the characteristic that you are quite far and disengaged from the subject. There is no distinguishing the 50 v 135 because it looks like you just stood further away with the longer lens rather than have them fill the frame more.
I would encourage you to get closer so that the main subject (a person) fills up one-third of the frame and see if you are pleased with the results.
I'm doing this as a series for Photo School. I have to pick 12 and I want to present them as a day at the park from morning to evening. Still have to do a night shot
I went back to the park today and took my 135mm.
Love your original 4&5, and some of these as well. But actually this second batch illustrates a problem you had with some of the first batch - you needed to get closer. Don't use the 135 to do that - use your feet.
Comments
Caroline
You may want to re-post over in Street & PJ as well.
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
But being the musician's wife, I can't help but love #2 - if for any reason at all because there's a melodica in that picture (Honey, are you reading this?). Those little guys pop up in the weirdest places.
I agree with the comment about posting them in PJ, they're all very candid yet still stunning.
Is it just me or am I the only one that can't figure out what's going on in #1, how is he upside down?
photography facebook
twitter
Ik heb dit naar het 'straat' forum verplaatst, Jeroen. (= I've moved this to the Street forum).
www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
I'm doing this as a series for Photo School. I have to pick 12 and I want to present them as a day at the park from morning to evening. Still have to do a night shot
I went back to the park today and took my 135mm.
9
10
11
12
13
14 Yes, that's the same guy in the same position as a few days back.
I think I'm going to crop off a bit of the right and the top of this photo.
15
16
I screwed it on my 350D using an M42-EOS adapter. So nothing works anymore I'm shooting on Av and focus manually.
I would encourage you to get closer so that the main subject (a person) fills up one-third of the frame and see if you are pleased with the results.
Love your original 4&5, and some of these as well. But actually this second batch illustrates a problem you had with some of the first batch - you needed to get closer. Don't use the 135 to do that - use your feet.
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed