#50 Re-shoot - c&c please

AndMan

Went back to re-shoot the road later in the day.
The police officer sent out to investigate the suspicious person on the bridge proved far more co-operative than the traffic.

Here is what I managed to capture.
Are any of these suitable for the challenge?
All c&c appreciated.

#1


#2


#3


#4

BinaryFx

Excellent AndMan

I like #2 and #4!

I can wait for the final entry EXIF, however would you mind sharing your exposure and aperture info?


Stephen Marsh

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~binaryfx/
http://prepression.blogspot.com/

kdotaylor

I was going to say the same thing: I like #2 and #4.

sunflowerstudio

kdotaylor wrote: »

I was going to say the same thing: I like #2 and #4.

I like #4, but am spending more time looking at #3. What happen there?

tinamarie52

#4 works for me. I like that the little red distraction on the left is missing from #4.

I'm curious about the oncoming headlights (or rooff lights) that seem to come out of the trees in #2.

Chris

travelways

#2 and #4 for me too, but maybe with the sky cropped...

Very nice

silversx80

I'm in with #2. I love the detail on the road. I also find myself wanting to see the lights continuous around the bends, but then again it's really interesting as it is.

AndMan

BinaryFx wrote: »

Excellent AndMan

I like #2 and #4!

I can wait for the final entry EXIF, however would you mind sharing your exposure and aperture info?


Stephen Marsh

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~binaryfx/
http://prepression.blogspot.com/

Thanks Stephen.
These were all taken iso 100 & f11, #1 was a 10 sec exposure & the rest were 15 seconds.

AndMan

kdotaylor wrote: »

I was going to say the same thing: I like #2 and #4.

Thanks for the feedback Kate.

AndMan

sunflowerstudio wrote: »

I like #4, but am spending more time looking at #3. What happen there?

Thanks for the feedback.
The upper lights in #3 are the cab running lights on what over here we call an artic (what you would call a semi) running with them is the blur of the trailer.

AndMan

tinamarie52 wrote: »

#4 works for me. I like that the little red distraction on the left is missing from #4.

I'm curious about the oncoming headlights (or rooff lights) that seem to come out of the trees in #2.

Chris

Thanks for the feedback Chris.

AndMan

photo-bug wrote: »

#2 and #4 for me too, but maybe with the sky cropped...

Very nice

Thanks Tatiana.

AndMan

silversx80 wrote: »

I'm in with #2. I love the detail on the road. I also find myself wanting to see the lights continuous around the bends, but then again it's really interesting as it is.

Thanks for the feedback Joe.

AndMan

Here are reworks of #2 & #4. I've cropped out the sky and removed the most obvious reflector in #2.

Are these better or worse than the originals?

#2a


#4a

TLVoDra

I really like 2a. Would have been fun to have police lights mixed in....

kidzmom

#2 andf #4. Fun and gorgeous. Nice work!

liflander

Ooooh, yesss, #2 is a wickedly cool s-curve shot. I like how it is clean compared to the others.

AndMan

TLVoDra wrote: »

I really like 2a. Would have been fun to have police lights mixed in....

Thanks for the feedback Tammy.

AndMan

kidzmom wrote: »

#2 andf #4. Fun and gorgeous. Nice work!

Thanks Kelly.

AndMan

liflander wrote: »

Ooooh, yesss, #2 is a wickedly cool s-curve shot. I like how it is clean compared to the others.

Thanks Mark.

WhatSheSaw

#2a. Nice and clean.

AndMan

WhatSheSaw wrote: »

#2a. Nice and clean.

Thanks for the feedback.

JerryBarton

hmmm. #2a does it for me, but now you have the candles too.

liflander

Re: #50 Re-shoot - c&c please
I still like the cleanest shot which was in the orig post!

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

AndMan

Thanks for the feedback guys, much appreciated.