AF-S 300mm vs Sigma 120-300mm
I need a long but not so expensive lens for birding and wildlife shooting. So which is better, Nikon AF-S 300mm f4 or Signma 120-300mm f2.8, in terms of Image Quality and Auto-Focusing.
Nikon D3s, N14-24, N24-70, N70-200 VR II
PC-E 24, SB-700, SB-600, Sony A55, TC-20E III
Sigma 500mm f4.5, Gitzo GT3530LS+GH2780QR
PC-E 24, SB-700, SB-600, Sony A55, TC-20E III
Sigma 500mm f4.5, Gitzo GT3530LS+GH2780QR
0
Comments
80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED. It seems to be a good lens but I haven't had the chance to play with it. Hope this helps.
www.simonebrogini.com
The Nikon 300, from what I understand takes TC's pretty good too. It would be lighter and easier to handle.
This series of backyard birds was shot with and without a TC on the Sigma 120-300.
http://jonh68.smugmug.com/Animals/32910-Robertsdale-Birds/11667849_F9E6v#823005602_CfaHM
I would vote for the Nikkor 300mm, f4 AF-s. A sharp prime wide open and a fast focusing lens.
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
I second Mitchells Opinion here....cav: I have the non-S verison and it does take 1.4 TC well, scooching you way on out there. Wide open it gets the shot but not all of the detailed fluff..Stopped down, Nice!
Below Wide open with Kenko 1.4TC
Below 150% crop, no TC @ 50 ft.
It isn't the case with every lens. Mine was soft at 2.8 but someone suggested some AF fine tuning for my d300 and d700. It became significantly sharper.
I would get the Nikon 300f4 for a lightweight wildlife lens. I would get the Sigma for a more versatile lens. In good light, you are not going to be shooting wide open on either lens anyway as DOF can make parts of wildlife soft anyway. When evening sets in, the 2.8 can be handy to get shots the f4 couldn't.
That said, I wish I had both. However, I have the 70-300 VR which is a great lightweight wildlife lens. I am holding out for a possible 80-400 VR update with afs.
Anyone here can give me some info about the Sigma?
Thank you.
Marcelo
I don't have the Sigma 300 2.8, but research I have done says most think the 120-300 is sharper than the Sigma prime.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Also the versatility of that zoom is nice. But I also got to use a Nikkor 300 2.8 and it was so nice and tack sharp. My problem has been the fact that the body kept loosing communication with the lens, two different lenses. Need to mess with the USB dock for it now and fine tune it.