Don Ricklin - Gear: Canon EOS 5D Mark III, was Pentax K7
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook.
Neat one, Richard. I love the way the light hits the man and his dog and the dynamic poses.
I'm with Benjamin about the bright foreground. I wouldn't crop it out, but I would consider darkening it some just so the eye doesn't get tempted to wander from the scene. But it's not my photo (darn!), it's yours.
Bottom line, I like it.
Virginia
_______________________________________________ "A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Neat one, Richard. I love the way the light hits the man and his dog and the dynamic poses.
I'm with Benjamin about the bright foreground. I wouldn't crop it out, but I would consider darkening it some just so the eye doesn't get tempted to wander from the scene. But it's not my photo (darn!), it's yours.
Bottom line, I like it.
Virginia
Thanks, Virginia. I toned it down a bit and while I was at it I tried a slight crop as well:
And thanks to you for the crop suggestion. As Jack said, it does make the subjects more prominent.
Grrr. I hate to be a contrarian, but I really preferred the first version. It feels more alive to me. I thought the brightness of the scene accentuated the man and dog's relationship and interaction. The modified foreground depresses the image and doesn't really match the exuberance of the pair.
Grrr. I hate to be a contrarian, but I really preferred the first version. It feels more alive to me. I thought the brightness of the scene accentuated the man and dog's relationship and interaction. The modified foreground depresses the image and doesn't really match the exuberance of the pair.
There's one in every crowd, grumble, grumble...
OK, I was hanging out in that spot because I was interested in the geometry of the benches and the combination of bright light and shadow. How about the original processing but with the second crop?
I've looked at the image too long to tell which I prefer at this point, and will have to look again in a couple of weeks.
Comments
Maybe crop foreground brightness
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
Don
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook .
Jack
(My real name is John but Jack'll do)
I'm with Benjamin about the bright foreground. I wouldn't crop it out, but I would consider darkening it some just so the eye doesn't get tempted to wander from the scene. But it's not my photo (darn!), it's yours.
Bottom line, I like it.
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
Thanks Jack. Probably about as many as I say it to one cat.
Thanks, Virginia. I toned it down a bit and while I was at it I tried a slight crop as well:
What do you think?
Jack
(My real name is John but Jack'll do)
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
patti hinton photography
Take care,
Tom
Love it when a plan comes together (thanks, George Peppard)
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
Grrr. I hate to be a contrarian, but I really preferred the first version. It feels more alive to me. I thought the brightness of the scene accentuated the man and dog's relationship and interaction. The modified foreground depresses the image and doesn't really match the exuberance of the pair.
OK, I was hanging out in that spot because I was interested in the geometry of the benches and the combination of bright light and shadow. How about the original processing but with the second crop?
I've looked at the image too long to tell which I prefer at this point, and will have to look again in a couple of weeks.