Flash for Wedding photography?
Daddy0
Registered Users Posts: 121 Major grins
I have been asked to photograph a friend's wedding. I have a D90 w/ a Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and a Nikkor 85mm 1.8. My question is what would be my best choices for on camera flash and possibly off camera on a small stand? I definitely want the flash to be able to act as a commander. If I am able to get 2 flashes, what would the recommendation be for the 2nd flash?
Thanks,
Thanks,
0
Comments
Sunpak 622's with Radio Control (RF) triggers (but one really needs a light meter for this)
Your D90 will work as the commander. Most likely this is all you need. You can control multiple SB 600s with it. Or a 900 and 600 or whatever. The Nikon CLS is pretty cool.
your best bet is of course 2 SB900's. If you can afford it then get them. Sb800 have been discontinued and "new" one are often selling for more then Sb900.
Sb900's are of course more powerful, have more zoom, etc but thing single biggest reason I like them better are the ergonomics. It is so easy to switch modes. For example to get into master slave mode, the 800 and 600 require you to hold down buttons for X sec, drive through several menus, select, figure out how to get back to the main screen, selct your channels. SB900 requires one lableled dial twist and you are in master or slave mode.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Remember the CLS system is basically line of sight or reflection, but it goes work well..
It's not what you look at that matters: Its what you see!
Nikon
http://www.time2smile.smugmug.com
Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr
When shooting with off camera flash, I like to use my Lastolite 2'x2' collapsible softbox. It's a bit pricey, but it's a great product. If $225 is too much of an investment for you, the Cheetah QBox is pretty similar. You'll just sacrifice some build quality.
As for on camera flash, Neil van Niekerk's method is what I do.
Save $5 on a new Smugmug Membership
Host your website for just $3.45/mo with JustHost - Rated best web host of 2010
See my profile for a gear list & more
Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr
next
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
And if not done correctly that can cause huge shadows under eyes, nose ....chin........but a Lumiquest Softbox is great......I use the original L.Q. softbox.........worx great, lightweight and folds flat for storage..................
A lot of times LumiQuest will have 2nds that will work perfectly for super real cheap.
That's what I do indoors for candids or when I'm pressed for time. Of course it's rather tough to bounce your flash off the sky when you're outside.
And when you have the time indoors, a softbox will always produce better light.
Save $5 on a new Smugmug Membership
Host your website for just $3.45/mo with JustHost - Rated best web host of 2010
See my profile for a gear list & more
With groups I can often use the ceiling along with some fill to produce light that I think would take a much more complicated setup using softboxes.
This was shot using a domed ceiling as the reflector for the key light coming from 2 - 1800 WS monolights fired in reverse into the ceiling and flanking the camera. Fill was from a single Sunpak 383 Super flash on a lightstand and pointed direct with no diffusion.
I would agree that for a single person to a 3 shot, especially in a home environment, I prefer softboxes, shoot-through umbrellas or a Softlighter instead.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Save $5 on a new Smugmug Membership
Host your website for just $3.45/mo with JustHost - Rated best web host of 2010
See my profile for a gear list & more