Aly is 18
telefotoguy
Registered Users Posts: 52 Big grins
Hi guys, she just turned 18 and I did a shoot for her 'debut' party Just wanted to share and hear your c&c's
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
0
Comments
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
- #1&2: beautiful
- Not liking the processing of #3, how about b&w?
- #4 such a cute shot, but so soft :cry + her eyes are blue > I'd desaturate that part
- #5: gorgeous
- #6 ... just toooo yellow for my taste .... I really like strong colors, but that's too much
- #7: my favorite
- #8&9: nice
- #10: Very pretty
Some of the processing in the images are the detractors just like Angie noted. I know that the push is to do these fabulously photoshopped images, but remember the loss of connection between the processing and the story behind the image.
***************************************
http://simplyphotostudio.com
http://decayedbeauty.com
Great set.
5 and 7 do it for me, I'd like to see a b+w conversion of 3.
Very nice work.
qarik - thanks! which pics in particular would the lighting fix be needed?
angie - sharp eyes (yours, lol), I didnt notice the bluish hue in the eyes. gotta fix that. I hope the guests didn't notice. haha
chris - thanks for the comments. I am trying to learn more PP though. right now, it's mostly presets.
brewstere - i'm working on b&w conversion and will post in a bit.
The image softness could be due to my lens (Sigma 70-200 II 2.8 without IS) coupled with the fact I have shaky hands. hehe.
www.cameraone.biz
I started the shoot with a studio strobe (#1 & #7) but as this was my first time to do something like this, I decided to just continue the shoot using the 'available light'
Which pictures do you feel are underexposed and which ones would need the subject repositioning?
This is just my opinion of what a judge would comment on when judging so take it for what you want. Everyone has an opinion and it is strictly that, an opinion.
#3 seems to be over especially in the hand, there is lost detail.
#4 seems to be under
#5 I like but the white wall takes your eye away. Rotate the image a 180 degrees and see what jumps out at you. Bright areas come forward and dark areas receede. (sp)
#7 clone out parallel white line to left of lamp
#8 hand seems awkard and not sure what it is doing. Appears to be holding on to something. Her body needs more of an S curve to make it more appealing.
#10 Maybe a horizontal crop. The chair back does nothing to enhance the photo.
Just my musings. You do have a great eye!!!! Good job.
www.cameraone.biz
The nearest one I'm aware of for you would be in Australia. Jerry Ghinios (sp) is a super instructor. http://www.jerryghionis.com/
www.cameraone.biz
Ren - thanks
This is the guy who's style I like and actually the pictures which my shots are inspired by:
http://mymetrophoto.com/
I very much prefer the redone #6. The original had that orange halo around her that I didn't care for.
I agree with Hackbone on the crop of #10. I find this crop awkard.
Comments and constructive criticism always welcome.
www.mikejulianaphotography.com
Facebook
@jayegirl - what about the santas?