#1: is OK, but I agree with B.D. …and I think I would have cropped different (f/g band of white…)
#2: I'm still trying to work this one out. The focus is OK (wall & background & part of girl's eyelashes, arm, edge of scarf) - but the fact that he's blurred means that he moved; he's looking at the camera, my take is that he might be heading for the photographer (uh, oh - look out, Benjamin! ). The fact that he's looking directly at the camera worries me…
Excellent to hear but I have to ask did you really mean #1.
I ask because I personally attribute those descriptions to #2.
#2 outside of what I said above reminded me of the line, "I'm ready for my close up Mr. Demille."
Yes, I meant #1. It's the juxtaposition of the man against the wall and whatever the guys are doing on the right then the surrealist touch of the back of the car to the left. I just really like the capture.
For some reason #2 is a miss for me. Objectively, I can see why others like it, but it just doesn't pull me in. Don't know why. (I am not bothered by the guy looking at you - I rather like that sometimes - can add an interesting edge and, although many if not most might consider it a no-no in street to have anyone in the photo looking at the photographer, the photographer is sometimes part of the scene and people's responses to that can be interesting.)
Virginia
_______________________________________________ "A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Yes, I meant #1. It's the juxtaposition of the man against the wall and whatever the guys are doing on the right then the surrealist touch of the back of the car to the left. I just really like the capture.
For some reason #2 is a miss for me. Objectively, I can see why others like it, but it just doesn't pull me in. Don't know why. (I am not bothered by the guy looking at you - I rather like that sometimes - can add an interesting edge and, although many if not most might consider it a no-no in street to have anyone in the photo looking at the photographer, the photographer is sometimes part of the scene and people's responses to that can be interesting.)
Virginia
Thanks loads for that.
Hey here's something we see differently for a change.
I do like #1 for all you mentioned but #2 has all the ambiguity for me.
Truth behind that image is way different then it looks.
#1: is OK, but I agree with B.D. …and I think I would have cropped different (f/g band of white…)
#2: I'm still trying to work this one out. The focus is OK (wall & background & part of girl's eyelashes, arm, edge of scarf) - but the fact that he's blurred means that he moved; he's looking at the camera, my take is that he might be heading for the photographer (uh, oh - look out, Benjamin! ). The fact that he's looking directly at the camera worries me…
Comments
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
One AND two for me. (Though I'd work on the tonality of #1 a bit. A little too gray and flat?)
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
Excellent to hear but I have to ask did you really mean #1.
I ask because I personally attribute those descriptions to #2.
I do think #1 is strange only because of the models (if we can call him that ) pose and of course the Wall.
#2 outside of what I said above reminded me of the line, "I'm ready for my close up Mr. Demille."
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
Both are fine pics.
Thanks B.D. I'll take another look at it.
Good
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
patti hinton photography
#2: I'm still trying to work this one out. The focus is OK (wall & background & part of girl's eyelashes, arm, edge of scarf) - but the fact that he's blurred means that he moved; he's looking at the camera, my take is that he might be heading for the photographer (uh, oh - look out, Benjamin! ). The fact that he's looking directly at the camera worries me…
Mmmm…
- Wil
Yes, I meant #1. It's the juxtaposition of the man against the wall and whatever the guys are doing on the right then the surrealist touch of the back of the car to the left. I just really like the capture.
For some reason #2 is a miss for me. Objectively, I can see why others like it, but it just doesn't pull me in. Don't know why. (I am not bothered by the guy looking at you - I rather like that sometimes - can add an interesting edge and, although many if not most might consider it a no-no in street to have anyone in the photo looking at the photographer, the photographer is sometimes part of the scene and people's responses to that can be interesting.)
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
Thanks loads for that.
Hey here's something we see differently for a change.
I do like #1 for all you mentioned but #2 has all the ambiguity for me.
Truth behind that image is way different then it looks.
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
Patti thanks
Will I'll work on it, honest
My Galleries
Flicker
G+