Hey Sam,
Why the blur on their feet in the first one? I don't really care for that, but otherwise a nice shot. The 2nd doesn't really appeal to me at all. Top of his head angle is distracting and too tight a crop on the 2nd one to my eyes.
Thanks for your honest input. I see what you mean with the first one and I went ahead and reworked it.
As for the second, this is full frame and while I like it I do need to know what others think. Wedding photography is about pleasing the clients not me, but I know there is a way to to both.
It's the constant search for perfection............which of course will never be reached.
Re: Two more from 5/30/10 Wedding
I see Matt's point about the top of the head in #2, but I really like the angle on the bride, and that's the focus of the shot for me.
Mark
Comments
Why the blur on their feet in the first one? I don't really care for that, but otherwise a nice shot. The 2nd doesn't really appeal to me at all. Top of his head angle is distracting and too tight a crop on the 2nd one to my eyes.
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
Thanks for your honest input. I see what you mean with the first one and I went ahead and reworked it.
As for the second, this is full frame and while I like it I do need to know what others think. Wedding photography is about pleasing the clients not me, but I know there is a way to to both.
It's the constant search for perfection............which of course will never be reached.
Sam
I see Matt's point about the top of the head in #2, but I really like the angle on the bride, and that's the focus of the shot for me.
Mark
LiflanderPhotography.com
LiflanderPhotography.com
Sam