niiiiccccee Z! Really lovely. Only tiny nit is that on this monitor at work her eyes look slightly oversharpened in #3 (but it may just be on this monitor which is always very contrast-y). Beautiful!
Thanks everyone.
She is such a sweet girl we really had a fun time.
Yes the depth of field is pretty thin at 2.8 and only about 4 feet away, not much is in focus.
Thanks Divamum appreciate your opinion, they look fine on my monitor at home. On my monitor at work everything looks like crap so can't say .
Just wondering about number one. She looks Photoshopped onto the background. Or, maybe too much sharpening. Just my opinion. But, she has a lot of separation from the background. And, it looks like her trailing leg has been partially over exposed...the foot, in particular, seems to have lost definition. To me, her exposure and the BG exposure don't look the same.
Comments?
2 is my favorite...very nice. 3 is also nice...and I do see the halo in her left eye...just to the right of her iris. Could be contacts, if you didn't do much sharpening.
Once I looked closely at 2, she also has the same halos only to the left of her iris...just not as noticeable until you look closely.
Thanks for sharing.
Remember, no one may want you to take pictures, but they all want to see them. Educate yourself like you'll live forever and live like you'll die tomorrow.
She really is pretty Zoomer! I love #2 and #3! The first, although is technically correct (well done), the shortness of her legs doesn't quite have the "it" if you know what I mean....hehe....I'm thinking of all the cool stuff one could do in PS with that one...
Thanks to all for the comments!
The flash and f4 create that feel of separation. The exposure is not supposed to be the same, I made her brighter.
5'2" doesn't leave much room for a lot of leg ....
Comments
edit: small nit on #3..I wish the earings were in focus.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
You have out done yourself! Great stuff!!
Sam
D40
18 - 55 kit lens
55- 200 VR kit lens
Lots of desires
She is such a sweet girl we really had a fun time.
Yes the depth of field is pretty thin at 2.8 and only about 4 feet away, not much is in focus.
Thanks Divamum appreciate your opinion, they look fine on my monitor at home. On my monitor at work everything looks like crap so can't say .
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Comments?
2 is my favorite...very nice. 3 is also nice...and I do see the halo in her left eye...just to the right of her iris. Could be contacts, if you didn't do much sharpening.
Once I looked closely at 2, she also has the same halos only to the left of her iris...just not as noticeable until you look closely.
Thanks for sharing.
Educate yourself like you'll live forever and live like you'll die tomorrow.
Ed
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
The flash and f4 create that feel of separation. The exposure is not supposed to be the same, I made her brighter.
5'2" doesn't leave much room for a lot of leg ....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
I agree 100%
D200
NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4 D
Tamron SP AF90mm f/2.8 Di 1:1
Welcome to my NEW website!
Mr. Christoferson
Holy schnikys!
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
I have seen your work around town and love what you do!