Sheri and Tom

tenoverthenosetenoverthenose Registered Users Posts: 815 Major grins
edited June 16, 2010 in Weddings
It's been a while since I've shared. Way too busy here. But this was a killer wedding :) Up in Yosemite again, I was hoping to take more photos of the couple, but we got jammed up in tourist traffic and didn't have a chance. Still a great couple and i think I have a new all time favorite photo. TONS more (and the full story)on my site www.patrickpike.com

1.
bd36cf965ad68d158f084aaff8a13dc8.jpg

2.
f2bfb5f53620454f5abbee5df0407727.jpg

3.
5bbbfcdda9e0ea845f5687721f3c4069.jpg

4.
42ae064ec670bce79070e06b976edc3b.jpg

5.
cf5e10cd903cca76fa41382c65193778.jpg

Comments

  • Moogle PepperMoogle Pepper Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Ooooh!!!

    These are sick!
    Food & Culture.
    www.tednghiem.com
  • mpauliempaulie Registered Users Posts: 303 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Game over!
    5.
    cf5e10cd903cca76fa41382c65193778.jpg
  • ScootersbabygirlScootersbabygirl Registered Users Posts: 224 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    HOW did you light that last one!! GIVE GIVE PLEASE!!
  • mmmattmmmatt Registered Users Posts: 1,347 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Dude... what do you say to these? 1 and 5 are even crazy good for YOU! Absolutly brilliant thought lighting the couple and trees while getting the stars... just WOW! 2 lights right? Tree's lit from a stand 8-10' up and couple from near the ground or did you somehow manage to do this all with 1 light? Only nit would be that I would probably burn the tree on the left to even it out a bit, but certainly a small thing in the scope of that one.

    Thanks so much for sharing these... really well done.

    Matt

    *edit* actually is that 2-3 exposures?
    My Smugmug site

    Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
    Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
    Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
  • Memories by MelindaMemories by Melinda Registered Users Posts: 140 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    bowdown.gif
  • smurfysmurfy Registered Users Posts: 343 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Stunning!!!!

    Is that last one a "Brenzier method" (compilation of more than one image?)
  • r3t1awr3ydr3t1awr3yd Registered Users Posts: 1,000 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Seriously, same question about #5. VERY nice.

    Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
    Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr
  • AgnieszkaAgnieszka Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,263 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Ohhhh, stop it already!!!! clap.gif
  • Moogle PepperMoogle Pepper Registered Users Posts: 2,950 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    Keep them coming, Pat! Though I do agree with Angie!
    Food & Culture.
    www.tednghiem.com
  • VayCayMomVayCayMom Registered Users Posts: 1,870 Major grins
    edited June 15, 2010
    wow, I feel so small.... bowdown.gifbow
    Trudy
    www.CottageInk.smugmug.com

    NIKON D700
  • tenoverthenosetenoverthenose Registered Users Posts: 815 Major grins
    edited June 16, 2010
    Thanks everyone! Yes, #5 is a composite of 5 photos. I took one of the couple first with a single light, then an exposure of the stars, then three shots of the trees lighting them up. Exact same setup as I used here, but on a different scale - http://patrickpike.com/2010/06/lighting-a-cadillac.html

    I did it REALLY quickly without thinking (I was way too tired to work too hard at this point). The whole process from setting it up to taking the five photos took less than 5 minutes. It would be possible to do with more than one light and do it all in one frame, but I was by myself and it was quicker to do it this way than setup multiple lights.
Sign In or Register to comment.