Do Two Raws Make a Right?

cletuscletus Registered Users Posts: 1,930 Major grins
edited July 8, 2010 in Finishing School
Was out shooting at the Belton Railroad yard last week. A locomotive and its reflection in a small puddle caught my eye. After uploading and doing some basic processing the loco looked O.K. but the puddle and reflection weren't looking too great:
927588114_eKE4e-L.jpg

What I tried was:
  • leave basic Camera Raw settings alone
  • open image as a Smart Object in Photoshop
  • copy the smart object inside Photoshop
  • open the smart object copy in Camera Raw
  • adjust settings to get the puddle looking better
  • switch back to PS
  • mask off the adjusted smart object copy, hiding everything but the puddle

Here's what I came up with:
927587292_YCcHT-L.jpg

I thought the puddle and reflection stood out a bit too much so I dialed back the opacity of the smart object copy:
927587423_2xCZN-L.jpg

I've put up some more details on the entire procedure here.

Any other thoughts on how I could have adjusted the puddle and reflection?

<i>Edit: Darkened the sky up a bit</i>
925131327_NNFP3-L-1.jpg

Comments

  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited July 8, 2010
    Creating two separate exposures in RAW as Smart Objects, as you describe here, is almost a routine step in my workflow at times. Your second Smart Object can be in B&W to blend with the original Smart Object in luminosity mode to have more precise control of shadow and highlight details also. So many ways to skin a cat in PS these days.

    I think in your image I might have included some of the sky along with the reflection, and darkened it with a steeper curve, perhaps, as well, for a more dramatic, foreboding sky.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Sign In or Register to comment.