A few from Bryce Canyon
Zerodog
Registered Users Posts: 1,480 Major grins
All shot with a fisheye.
1. Sunrise
2.
3.
4.
5. Tripod setup for sunrise. On the rail at sunrise point.
1. Sunrise
2.
3.
4.
5. Tripod setup for sunrise. On the rail at sunrise point.
0
Comments
I'm also curious - what ball head do you have on your Gorillapod?
I have really been liking the fisheye for the weird perspective on things. Bryce was cool because it looks like a big bowl anyway. So it just exaggerates that shape.
That is a Gorillapod focus with a Gitzo ballhead. The Gitzo QR plate sucks so I swapped it out with a Kirk Arca Swiss style QR. It is pretty sweet. The Gitzo ball is awesome. It is really strong and really light. Combined with the Kirk plate it is killer. Gorillapod has a new Arca Swiss style QR ball head for this tripod that I think I might go get. I checked it out and it is smaller and lighter than the Gitzo and feels strong enough. It is also only $60 too. The more I use the Gorillapod the more I like it. You just have to be creative with it. I have been using it as a flash bracket too. Enough so that I picked up a smaller one for just that purpose.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Interesting comments about the Gorillapod/ballhead. How does the gorillapod work when you try to use it as a small tripod? Is it stable enough, or do you need to wrap it around something?
Randy C
SmugMug
Thanks!
I could easily crop #4 to an 8x10 format and loose the people. But I still sort of like the perspective of them on the trail too. If I were to print it I would crop it.
The Gorillapod can be used on its own but that is not what it is best at. That I think is the mistake people make when using them. It works really good on a rough surface. Like a rock or a log. I took some sunrise pics in Hawaii with it perched on a rock. You bend the legs around to even it out and poke into holes and such. The rubber on it is pretty grippy. You can also lay it out on things sort of like an octopus too. On a smooth surface, like a table, it tends to get squeezed down with anything bigger than a small prime. But that is when you can just lay it out. But wrapped around something it will hold my 80-200AFS 2.8 mounted on my D300s.
Thanks for the info. I may need to give it a try. And, again, amazing shots!
Randy C
SmugMug
A lover of all things photography.
Olympus E-500
My Smugmug Gallery
Some lenses just seem to have a tendancey to do it. This fisheye seems like one of them . Other lenses seem to just blow out. I think they are cool. My little Canon S90 does some really nice stars too.
Thanks everyone. I thought these were just so so shots of a place that gets photographed all the time. I am glad people like them. Maybe I just spent too long looking at them.
When you stop a lens down, or the camera in automatic stops down to small apertures, the star is caused by an intense light source in the scene ans its light rays passing by the the 'corners' formed by the blades of the aperture in the lens.
i saw a series yesterday of a sunset and no star until sun partially gone over horizon, then when only a 14 of sun showing in this case-Stars!
Some lenses more prone to this depending on number of blades in aperture design.
Hope this helps,
Rod
Remember though when you stop the lens way down you get diffraction(which is the term for what is happening here) and so large enlargements are probably out.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
Here are a few more.
6.
7.
8. The goofy handheld portrait. For some reason, I like em.