NiZn AA batteries

jchinjchin Registered Users Posts: 713 Major grins
edited July 17, 2010 in Accessories
Have you heard of NiZn (Nickel-Zinc) batteries? These rechargeable AA batteries are suppose to have 1.6V and about 2500mAH. I am wondering if they are any good.
Johnny J. Chin ~ J. Chin Photography
FacebookFlickrSmugMug
SmugMug referral coupon code: ix3uDyfBU6xXs
(use this for a discount off your SmugMug subscription)

Comments

  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited July 16, 2010
    According to this Strobist page:

    http://strobist.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-nizn-batteries-offer-lightning-fast.html

    ... people are reporting cell voltages up to 1.85v, well above the design voltage for many devices. I would recommend caution.

    You also "must" use a special charger for these cells.

    It's an interesting technology but I will wait a couple of years to see if people are noticing much premature device failure.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • rsquaredrsquared Registered Users Posts: 306 Major grins
    edited July 17, 2010
    ziggy53 wrote: »
    According to this Strobist page:

    http://strobist.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-nizn-batteries-offer-lightning-fast.html

    ... people are reporting cell voltages up to 1.85v, well above the design voltage for many devices. I would recommend caution.

    You also "must" use a special charger for these cells.

    It's an interesting technology but I will wait a couple of years to see if people are noticing much premature device failure.

    Yup, the listed voltage is the "nominal" voltage, which is always lower than the voltage you will get from a fully charged battery. A 1.5V battery will measure over 1.6V brand new, and a 1.2V NiCd will measure around 1.35V fully charged.

    Also, if you look closely at the pictures (the ones I've seen anyway), they are actually rated at 2500 mWH (That's milli-Watt Hours, not milli-Amp Hours) and 2500 mWH at 1.6V is the same as saying 1560 mAH... But then again, a 1.2V NiCd @ 2000 mAH runs is the same as saying 2400 mWH... so total power (which is what Watts measure) is actually comparable to current batteries.
    Rob Rogers -- R Squared Photography (Nikon D90)
  • rpcrowerpcrowe Registered Users Posts: 733 Major grins
    edited July 17, 2010
    Not exactly an answer to your query...
    I have been extremely happy with Eneloop rechargeable batteries. I have not made any scientific tests but, they appear to provide more falshes and quicker recycle time than even top-line alkeline batteries such as Energizer. This is despite the fact that they appear less powerful on paper.

    They also appear to have quite a good capacity to hold their charge over an extended period. Again, I have not bothered to make scientific tests but, they appear to hold charges better than other rechageables I have used in the past,

    Eneloop price is not bad either. I bought a set of eight AA and two AAA batteries along with recharger, and a set of converters which wil allow the AA batteries to be used as C and D cells, for a bit over $25 USD.
Sign In or Register to comment.