Brooklyn Bridge Pano

kirbinsterkirbinster Registered Users Posts: 301 Major grins
edited July 26, 2010 in Landscapes
Took this yesterday on the Kelby photowalk in NYC. I shot it full manual, but am not very pleased with it. Any comments on how it could be improved would be appreciated:
4826901716_d7b8459c54_b_d.jpg

link to: Full size
Nikon D700, D300, D5000 , Nikon 85mm f/1.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII, 70-300AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 10.5mm Fisheye, Sigma 12-24mm, Nikon 24-70 f/2.8, 2 SB-600 Speedlights Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
Flickr Photobucket

Comments

  • JimKarczewskiJimKarczewski Registered Users Posts: 969 Major grins
    edited July 26, 2010
    My question would be what lens you shot this with? I normally, well, 95% of the time will use my 50 or 85 depending on the distance of the subject. I've found if I used my 16-35 or any other wide I get weird perspective and distortions, much like the "hump" in the bridge, which you are going to get, but you really got something pronounced there. Searching around online, even commercially available images you'll find them with less curve in the center of the image. Hell, it could be the stitching too, depending on what you use, but I'm betting by the way the Verizon building and the earth curve, you were using a wide angle which I personally as mentioned, don't find good for panoramas.

    Also, you need to work on a little more head room for the image. The bridge is too close to the top of the frame, IMHO.
    Just a random pic I found online which shows much less "curve"
    2008-02-brooklyn-bridge-700_geerds_postcard.jpg
  • kirbinsterkirbinster Registered Users Posts: 301 Major grins
    edited July 26, 2010
    I think the problem, as you surmise, is the wide angle lens. I was using my Sigma 10-20 (at 20mm) as it was what was on the body at the time. Further, I was standing at the building at the far left corner in the shot you posted, so I rotated about 290 degrees through the image and was very close to the bridge at the start and then almost straight away at the end of the bridge - I think this may be what messed up the shot.
    Nikon D700, D300, D5000 , Nikon 85mm f/1.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII, 70-300AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 10.5mm Fisheye, Sigma 12-24mm, Nikon 24-70 f/2.8, 2 SB-600 Speedlights Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
    Flickr Photobucket
  • r3t1awr3ydr3t1awr3yd Registered Users Posts: 1,000 Major grins
    edited July 26, 2010
    IMHO, I don't mind the wide grossly barreled shot but definitely less water and more sky might improve the shot. .

    Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
    Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr
  • digger2digger2 Registered Users Posts: 91 Big grins
    edited July 26, 2010
    A bit less water
    Would not hurt, along with a bit more sky.
    Lr3 can remove the distortion easily
Sign In or Register to comment.