#1 and #2 are excellent (I'm a fan of well done HDR so find these very nice - assuming that's the processing you used). #3 not so much, but I can't really find anything wrong with it. I love #2 but the blurring in the lower right hand corner distracts me a little bit. The smiles you captured on those little girls is great. Especially the girl with the blue hood. Very nice!
My only nitpick on #1 is the halo around her hair. Otherwise I like it a lot.
Lucius is a great tool. Watch out if you go to windows 7 it will not work, at least on my pc it will not. I will need to go to the newer much more expensive version to work with 7.
Lucius is a great tool. Watch out if you go to windows 7 it will not work, at least on my pc it will not. I will need to go to the newer much more expensive version to work with 7.
Do you have the new (expensive version) or the older (much, much less expensive version)?
Charles, I have LucisArt 3 ED a step down from the 3 SE which has more features and I must say that it is quite expensive. I only wish that LucisArt had more options rather than just the two slide buttons. I also use Nik Color Efex Pro and photoshop. I some times will do a ONE image Raw HDR and then place into LucisArt.
if lucis art was more affordable, i'd definitely give it a go..
Or, at least, if they had full blows Demos.. but they are too closeminded, so my business avoids them.
I have the older version which was very reasonably priced and when I first switched to windows 7 it would not work. Since you said you were using it I tried it again and today it works......thanks for getting me to try it again.
I like the first one a lot, excellent composition and treatment, looks like an Orton effect. The third one isn't working for me, I think because of the distracting detail in the wall. An affordable alternative to Lucis is Topaz Adjust. I think it does just about everything Lucis does, and a lot more for a lot less money.
I have the older version which was very reasonably priced and when I first switched to windows 7 it would not work. Since you said you were using it I tried it again and today it works......thanks for getting me to try it again.
Your welcome Charles. It appears that windows 7 tends to make software work much better than Vista.
Comments
My only nitpick on #1 is the halo around her hair. Otherwise I like it a lot.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
www.cameraone.biz
Hello Hackbone, I am actually using Windows 7...No problem yet.
Reynaldo Williams
www.creativephotoimagesllc.com
www.creativephotoimages.smugmug.com
www.cameraone.biz
words up!
Charles, I have LucisArt 3 ED a step down from the 3 SE which has more features and I must say that it is quite expensive. I only wish that LucisArt had more options rather than just the two slide buttons. I also use Nik Color Efex Pro and photoshop. I some times will do a ONE image Raw HDR and then place into LucisArt.
Reynaldo Williams
www.creativephotoimagesllc.com
www.creativephotoimages.smugmug.com
www.facebook.com/Reynaldo_Williams
Moderator of the People and Go Figure forums
My Smug Site
Or, at least, if they had full blows Demos.. but they are too closeminded, so my business avoids them.
good shots, though
My Site
My Facebook
I have the older version which was very reasonably priced and when I first switched to windows 7 it would not work. Since you said you were using it I tried it again and today it works......thanks for getting me to try it again.
www.cameraone.biz
My Site
My Facebook
Your welcome Charles. It appears that windows 7 tends to make software work much better than Vista.
Reynaldo Williams
www.creativephotoimagesllc.com
www.creativephotoimages.smugmug.com