What would you do?
studio1972
Registered Users Posts: 249 Major grins
Ok, so I'm editing a client's wedding photographs from a large asian wedding and I come across a photo of a little girl, probably about 2 years old, whose teeth are in a terrible state. Really shockingly bad! :cry This is child abuse in my opinion, but it was not a close family member of the client as far as I can tell. What should I do?
a) Edit out the photo to avoid embarrassment.
b) Leave it in, it is a nice photo apart from the teeth, and maybe it will shame the mother to change her ways?
c) Mention it to the client.
d) Call social services.
I feel in a way that d is the morally right thing to do, but that I will probably go for b. I have attached a cropped version so you can see how bad the teeth are.
Would really appreciate some opinions though.:scratch
a) Edit out the photo to avoid embarrassment.
b) Leave it in, it is a nice photo apart from the teeth, and maybe it will shame the mother to change her ways?
c) Mention it to the client.
d) Call social services.
I feel in a way that d is the morally right thing to do, but that I will probably go for b. I have attached a cropped version so you can see how bad the teeth are.
Would really appreciate some opinions though.:scratch
0
Comments
Keep the photo if it's a good shot.
you have no idea what caused the teeth to become like that. calling CPS based on a photo of bad teeth is just wrong.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Well, I think we all have a pretty good idea what caused it, Tooth decay is a well understood phenomenon. Worst I've ever seen though. I'm not saying that they are actively hurting the child or anything like that, just that this is neglect, which is a form of abuse imho.
The child is too young to complain, or even to understand, of course.
In the end though, I just decided to keep the shot in the set that went to the client. That way it's out there and people who know the family can deal with it if they wish. I really hope they do.
*The child could be ill and on medications that causes the teeth to be weak and prone to decay.
*The child could have been ill in the past and on medications that caused the teeth to develop improperly
*The child could have been ill and the illness itself caused the teeth to develop improperly
*The child could have an illness right now that has symptoms that cause tooth decay
*The child could have been adopted or is a foster child and the previous parents are responsible for the decay issue
*The child could have been in a terrible accident that caused the teeth to be broken/chipped/cracked etc and it may have been determined by their dentist to be better to simply leave them to fall out on their own rather than to pull them.
Gosh, it's a good thing my school photographer in kindergarten didn't think like you. My top two incisors came in with giant holes in them. Right there in front, every time I smiled, there were those awful holes. They didn't hurt, the teeth themselves were healthy and despite how large the holes were, they didn't increase in size as I got older. I brushed regularly and as the oldest of 4, in a family that moved a LOT in my early childhood, my mom simply could not get me to a dentist the moment the teeth emerged like that. When I was in 1st grade, I did get to the dentist and they were filled, but only for cosmetic reasons. There was nothing actually wrong with the teeth other than their appearance. It certainly looked like my parents never made me brush my teeth, but I assure you that was not the case. Sometimes even a photograph doesn't really tell the whole story.
My Flickr
EOS 700D, 100 mm f/2.8 Macro USM,
EF-S 55-250 F/4-5.6 IS, EF-50 f/1.8,
EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, EF-S 10-18 mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM