You'll let me know if I'm bugging you, won't you?

Bend The LightBend The Light Registered Users Posts: 1,887 Major grins
edited August 26, 2010 in Holy Macro
I am on a mission to get some GOOD bug pics. Was out today in my folks' garden and took these...
These are taken on my Canon 400d, 18-55mm kit lens installed correctly with +1, +2, +4, +10 dioptre filters added, and light provided by my super duper light diffuser/deflector that I made from mount board and tin foil. What do you think?

4927408922_1127d3ab27_b.jpg

4927432340_9fa571a29e_b.jpg

4927014063_c116ebca07_b.jpg

4926903989_1e0e9ec836_b.jpg

Here is the Super Duper Light Diffuser/Deflector...

4915239789_01f38eea0b_z.jpg

Comments

  • GOLDENORFEGOLDENORFE Super Moderators Posts: 4,747 moderator
    edited August 25, 2010
    the last bumble bee shot looks best
    a lot of noise in a few and look a bit soft.
    are you cropping alot?
  • Chrissiebeez_NLChrissiebeez_NL Registered Users Posts: 1,295 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    bugging? puuhllleeez :D

    The focus on all these is very nice but there are still some nits that take it from a truly excellent shot:

    1: a little soft and CA (from the filter?)
    2: nice soft light on the subject but very poor noise
    3: lovely focus and composition, as well as colours but somehow lacks contrast in the face (some leaf in the way?)
    4: same strange contrast around the face and composition is mwah
    5: jowzers!

    If you need a high iso try getting at least the colour noise out (and maybe the grain as well)

    cant really help you with the rest cause i think it may come from the filters headscratch.gif
    Visit my website at christopherroos.smugmug.com
  • Bend The LightBend The Light Registered Users Posts: 1,887 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    The noise will be because of high ISo, 800 on these. I realised that I was using too high ISO to compensate for small apertures (f36). Next time I will try lowering ISO, and opening the aperture a little, but not so much to jeopardise the DoF.

    There could be Chromatic Aberation, yes. The filters I added are not expensive...I have so little money to get gear for this I have to buy cheap, or MAKE stuff!

    Not sure where the "lack of contrast" in the face of the bees is from, other than it could be reflected light from the petals around...there would be no leaves in the way, they were on the top-most blooms of the flowers. I did notice that, but was not sure how to counteract it.

    There is SOME cropping, but not too much. Also note that these are reduced quality from the originals - I resize and watermark for Flickr...my originals MIGHT not look quite so soft, perhaps?

    Anyway, thanks guys for your input. thumb.gif
  • GOLDENORFEGOLDENORFE Super Moderators Posts: 4,747 moderator
    edited August 25, 2010
  • Bend The LightBend The Light Registered Users Posts: 1,887 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    GOLDENORFE wrote: »
    f36 ! ?

    i have never shot lower than f14 :D

    Yeah, maybe that's my trouble, eh?
  • Chrissiebeez_NLChrissiebeez_NL Registered Users Posts: 1,295 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    hope you dont mind but i tried removing the noise and sharpening up a bit. will remover it in a second if you dont like me posting it :):

    just two seconds work

    Dont know if sharpening was such a great move on this image with this much noise but as you can see the noise is less prominent when you take the colour noise out thumb.gif

    982581005_gLZRj-O.jpg
    Visit my website at christopherroos.smugmug.com
  • Chrissiebeez_NLChrissiebeez_NL Registered Users Posts: 1,295 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    GOLDENORFE wrote: »
    f36 ! ?

    i have never shot lower than f14 :D

    That could explain some of the softness though rolleyes1.gif

    Lenses have a 'sweet spot' in aperture. Below it it becomes soft but way above it just as well.
    Visit my website at christopherroos.smugmug.com
  • Bend The LightBend The Light Registered Users Posts: 1,887 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    hope you dont mind but i tried removing the noise and sharpening up a bit. will remover it in a second if you dont like me posting it :):

    just two seconds work

    Dont know if sharpening was such a great move on this image with this much noise but as you can see the noise is less prominent when you take the colour noise out thumb.gif

    No, I don't mind. What noise removal do you use? I trialed Topaz, and liked it, but haven't paid for it yet. I also have a method using surface blur and layers which is quite nice.

    I like what you have done with the noise, but agree that sharpening wasn't so good, perhaps. Then again, it wasn't a big original RAW file, was it? :D
  • Chrissiebeez_NLChrissiebeez_NL Registered Users Posts: 1,295 Major grins
    edited August 25, 2010
    just the colour noise removal in photoshop raw (3?) :D
    Visit my website at christopherroos.smugmug.com
  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited August 26, 2010
    Not bad at all.
    I don't really understand your camera settings though, When shooting with flash I'd shoot with the camera in manual , ISO 100, F11,1/200th. This will give you sharper looking shots with much less noise.
    Brian v.
  • Bend The LightBend The Light Registered Users Posts: 1,887 Major grins
    edited August 26, 2010
    just the colour noise removal in photoshop raw (3?) :D

    Ok, I'll look into that. Thanks! :)
  • Bend The LightBend The Light Registered Users Posts: 1,887 Major grins
    edited August 26, 2010
    Not bad at all.
    I don't really understand your camera settings though, When shooting with flash I'd shoot with the camera in manual , ISO 100, F11,1/200th. This will give you sharper looking shots with much less noise.
    Brian v.

    Thanks.

    Yeah, I am beginning to understand...slowly!

    I'll get there...thumb.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.