Options

Last few weddings... constructive comments appreciated!

IzpipoIzpipo Registered Users Posts: 43 Big grins
edited September 15, 2010 in Weddings
here are a few pics from the last weddings I have shot!

Feel free to offer me some feedback, I want to see these pics from another expert eye!

1.
58957_10150278502440161_794800160_14632530_3675442_n.jpg

2.
58739_10150278502330161_794800160_14632525_7211849_n.jpg

3.
61659_10150278502795161_794800160_14632538_5986509_n.jpg

4.
60972_10150278502905161_794800160_14632540_1049781_n.jpg

5.
60533_10150278502970161_794800160_14632541_6024737_n.jpg

Comments

  • Options
    QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited September 13, 2010
    these are quite nice. I would lose the tilt in the last shot.
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
  • Options
    IzpipoIzpipo Registered Users Posts: 43 Big grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    Qarik wrote: »
    these are quite nice. I would lose the tilt in the last shot.

    By Tilt you mean the BW/color scheme?
  • Options
    QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    I mean straigten the image out...its leaning left and I don't think it adds to the shot at all. I don't mind the slective colring there. =)
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
  • Options
    studio1972studio1972 Registered Users Posts: 249 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    Not sure about the bride's expression in 4, and 2 looks overly airbrushed, but otherwise nice. Really like 1 and 3 and the tilt in 5 doesn't bother me TBH.
  • Options
    tenoverthenosetenoverthenose Registered Users Posts: 815 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    Generally it looks as if these were overexposed. Too many hot spots / lost detail. Too much clarity for my taste, it leads to lots of halos. Also watch the color cast on the brides dress in #3.
  • Options
    Matthew SavilleMatthew Saville Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,352 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    * I don't know what your processing technique is, but these images look really low-res, like they were sharpened wrong and THEN uploaded to Facebook. Especially the 2nd one. Are you going to town with smoothing and sharpening actions in Photoshop? Are you compressing the images a ton?

    * Please tell me that image #5's processing was only because the bride DEMANDED it. The 90's just called, they're gonna revoke your Photoshop license if they catch you doing partial B&W again.

    Okay I kid, I kid, (well not really) ...the images themselves are beautiful, and I mean it. Editing is a FAR better thing to disagree on, compared to downright bad photos. :-P

    =Matt=
    My first thought is always of light.” – Galen Rowell
    My SmugMug PortfolioMy Astro-Landscape Photo BlogDgrin Weddings Forum
  • Options
    AgnieszkaAgnieszka Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,263 Major grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    Hey there.

    I think the photos are fairly nice. Just some remarks:

    I do *hope* that you just turned the quality waaaaaayy down so it's easier for you to upload those pics to a gallery. They seem awwwwfullly grainy to me (and I'm sure to anybody else on here).

    #2: she has hot spots all over her face & arm
    #3: her dress is blown, but it is a nice composition / pose, though I wish he would be holding her arm (I don't even see his arm, is it there? headscratch.gif)
    #4: doesn't do it for me ne_nau.gif
    #5: rolleyes1.gif@ Matt
  • Options
    IzpipoIzpipo Registered Users Posts: 43 Big grins
    edited September 14, 2010
    Agnieszka wrote: »
    Hey there.

    I think the photos are fairly nice. Just some remarks:

    I do *hope* that you just turned the quality waaaaaayy down so it's easier for you to upload those pics to a gallery. They seem awwwwfullly grainy to me (and I'm sure to anybody else on here).

    #2: she has hot spots all over her face & arm
    #3: her dress is blown, but it is a nice composition / pose, though I wish he would be holding her arm (I don't even see his arm, is it there? headscratch.gif)
    #4: doesn't do it for me ne_nau.gif
    #5: rolleyes1.gif@ Matt

    Thank you all for your constructive comments

    a. YES these are LOW-RES, the real images are not grainy at all (I would never post hi-res againpics after I've seen some of my pics being sold on the web)

    b. the 80's pic (lol I also laughed hard at this... cause its true!) is part of a sequence of pics I used for their slideshow.. i'll pot them later, yiu'll understand!

    c. Hotspots... stll trying to find the right balance when I have such a strong light source.... Im too greedy with my f-stops, guess I need to learn to bring it up a notch!

    d.

    Thanks all!!!!
  • Options
    shmingshming Registered Users Posts: 93 Big grins
    edited September 15, 2010
    #1: I like the colors, ring shots always look the same to me.
    #2: Nice shot, love the shoes
    #3: OK this is my opinion: I try to avoid legs spread regardless of sex, but otherwise great shot
    #4: Another opinion: looks like he's going straight for his zipper.
    #5: Typical and trendy. I'm not saying I didn't like it. I'm just saying I've seen this shot a million times.

    Post Processing Opinion: I don't know, I wasn't there when you did it, but I must say back off on the sharpening tool.

    PS: there are way more positives than negatives regarding these photos. (just thought you should know that) Overall: good job :)
    KLinh
    Klinh Evelyn Grace Photography
    Fashion & Commercial
    (2)Mamiya RZ67 IID, Mamiya 645 AFD II, Leaf Aptus 65, Profoto D1's, Capture One.
    http://www.klinhevelyngracephotography.com
Sign In or Register to comment.