Unconventional Duck Shots

rwells

Evidently, I have no regard for the sanctity of a "normal" duck shot :huh

digidrone

Nice photos Randy,
#3 is the winner IMO!!!

rwells

digidrone wrote: »

Nice photos Randy,
#3 is the winner IMO!!!

Appreciate that!

Stephany

Randy, to me all three look quite 'normal' :-) and very beautiful. May I ask which one is your favored? <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

bgarland

All 3 are great but I agree on #3 being my favorite. Nice work.

ront

I really like 1 & 3!!

Ron

rwells

Stephany wrote: »

Randy, to me all three look quite 'normal' :-) and very beautiful. May I ask which one is your favored? <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

Thanks Stephany,
I never seem to have favorites, that's why I don't have any of my images on my walls <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/ne_nau.gif&quot; border="0" alt="" >

What I meant by "normal", is... Look in the "Wildlife" forum. Those guys would pluck all my feathers if I were to post these over there <img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/rolleyes1.gif&quot; border="0" alt="" >

rwells

bgarland wrote: »

All 3 are great but I agree on #3 being my favorite. Nice work.

Thanks Brad

rwells

ront wrote: »

I really like 1 & 3!!

Ron

Thanks for the input Ron!

Carmelo75

1 & 3 are my favorites as well, really great shots!clap

I wish there would have been a little bit of detail in the ducks head in #2, to see the eye for example...

Nice work!

Carmelo.

rwells

Carmelo75 wrote: »

1 & 3 are my favorites as well, really great shots!clap

I which there would have been a little bit of detail in the ducks head in #2, to see the eye for example...

Nice work!

Carmelo.

Thanks for your input Carmelo!

ChaKira

bgarland wrote: »

All 3 are great but I agree on #3 being my favorite. Nice work.

00SS

I'm with everyone on 1 & 3.. but something about the colors/processing on #1 that i really dig .. great job

Stephany

What I meant by "normal", is... Look in the "Wildlife" forum. Those guys would pluck all my feathers if I were to post these over there
Randy <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" /><v:shapetype id=_x0000_t75 path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" stroked="f" filled="f" o:preferrelative="t" o:spt="75" coordsize="21600,21600"> <v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1&quot;></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path o:connecttype="rect" gradientshapeok="t" o:extrusionok="f"></v:path><o:lock aspectratio="t" v:ext="edit"></o:lock></v:shapetype><v:shape style="WIDTH: 29.25pt; HEIGHT: 11.25pt" id=_x0000_i1025 alt="" type="#_x0000_t75"><v:imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\Eva\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.gif" o:href="http://www.dgrin.com/images/smilies/yelrotflmao.gif"></v:imagedata></v:shape><o:p></o:p&gt;
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->_________________ <o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
Randy,<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
to me, computer ‘painting’ is scary stuff. But, I do not think this series is overdone at all (#1 made me smile). I also like the tranquility in#2 but here would like to see a little more detail in the head, if possible. Anywho, this is how I see it, others may totally disagree.