Ok...
i'll bite--why the selective coloring?
What is the reason for using it, and what are you trying to call attention to in the shot? Sure she has a nice smile, but why do I need to look at the pizza or her hair? Do those elements tell me anything?
It might be an ok street portrait maybe, without those elements. As it is, it does not work for me ok? ok.
"Selective Color" oh dear oh dear aren't those fightin words !!
I will admit to finding the feet, sexy :wow
Oh I'm dying here . Patti outed!!!
As I scrolled down before reading your words I was going to say that selective coloring can be gimmicky--then I noted the shoes and said to myself "although I do like the red shoes". Then I saw that it was Patti's .
I think it rarely works. I guess it didn't work on yours, though I applaud you for trying something new to you.
Her conversion rocks also. I think alot of times people do selective coloring and only work on the color part and don't fix the rest.
I have a horrible horrendous color selective shot in my gallery myself (I mean it's sooooo bad, but I can't bring myself to delete it--but I will when I get home in case a potential client should see it), I guess we all gotta try it--we just don't post it .
Well, yeah, and people have been copying it ever since. The key word is rarely. Doesn't mean never, just means you need to have a pretty compelling reason to use it or you will face the wrath of ten thousand photographers who think it's a cliché. The main problem with it is that it usually calls too much attention to itself. In your pic, the selective color made me miss the hands altogether, not because I couldn't see their color. Now you would be right in pointing out that if I had been paying more attention I would have seen them, but the selective color treatment you used drew all my (limited) attention to the hair and the pizza.
Well, yeah, and people have been copying it ever since. The key word is rarely. Doesn't mean never, just means you need to have a pretty compelling reason to use it or you will face the wrath of ten thousand photographers who think it's a cliché. The main problem with it is that it usually calls too much attention to itself. In your pic, the selective color made me miss the hands altogether, not because I couldn't see their color. Now you would be right in pointing out that if I had been paying more attention I would have seen them, but the selective color treatment you used drew all my (limited) attention to the hair and the pizza.
The hair and pizza is what caught my eye and made me take the shot.
My example wasn't the best example.. like I said- it was simply an exercise to use this technique, and my first attempt.
First attempts are funny.. like do you remember your first real kiss?
Here's two shot's from Schindlers list that I think worked:
I can't see the shots for some reason--little red xs on my computer. But it has to be the little girl in the red coat right? It helped to tell a story and it made her stand out, the director had reasons for wanting her to stand out.
Like I said "rarely" works.
Don't like the strawberry shot either. So maybe we just have different tastes.
And yes I do remember my first kiss--all braces and sweetness.
As I scrolled down before reading your words I was going to say that selective coloring can be gimmicky--then I noted the shoes and said to myself "although I do like the red shoes". Then I saw that it was Patti's .
I think it rarely works. I guess it didn't work on yours, though I applaud you for trying something new to you.
Her conversion rocks also. I think alot of times people do selective coloring and only work on the color part and don't fix the rest.
I have a horrible horrendous color selective shot in my gallery myself (I mean it's sooooo bad, but I can't bring myself to delete it--but I will when I get home in case a potential client should see it), I guess we all gotta try it--we just don't post it .
wink I'm outa the closet!! I have, on a very few occassions done a selective colour shot but you will notice that they have NEVER been posted here. I may be crazy but I'm not stupid ( no offense MisterB but I know the feelings here about selective colour and generally, I don't like them either).
My friend's daughter's shoes were just screaming at me to do it. She and her mum love the shot so for them it works. The Red Rider shot is the first I ever tried.
If you feel I must be excumunicated from the forum I will understand (hair shirt is on and I've put pebbles in my shoes for penance) bow
The use of a camera is similar to that of a knife. You can use it to peel potatoes, or carve a flute. ~ E. Kahlmeyer
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
The rest look really tacky & overdone to my taste but that's just me. I've seen a few where the reflection only is in colour and they've been a bit interesting. One thing I absolutely detest are selectively coloured wedding shots. They REALLY look gimmicky and tacky to me. Just my 2 cents.
The use of a camera is similar to that of a knife. You can use it to peel potatoes, or carve a flute. ~ E. Kahlmeyer
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
Hey, I took some knocks myself for one I posted last year. You're just lucky Rutt isn't around.
I remember this one! and I almost brought it up in the conversation as one of those rare times that it works. I thought it worked, Rutt thought otherwise .
wink I'm outa the closet!! I have, on a very few occassions done a selective colour shot but you will notice that they have NEVER been posted here. I may be crazy but I'm not stupid ( no offense MisterB but I know the feelings here about selective colour and generally, I don't like them either).
My friend's daughter's shoes were just screaming at me to do it. She and her mum love the shot so for them it works. The Red Rider shot is the first I ever tried.
If you feel I must be excumunicated from the forum I will understand (hair shirt is on and I've put pebbles in my shoes for penance) bow
Ha ha ha.. well I'm sorry I opened Pandora's Box!
I like the usage of selective color.. despite this forums prevailing mindset of "If it ain't grainy, gritty, and from the city- it's shitty!"
I remember this one! and I almost brought it up in the conversation as one of those rare times that it works. I thought it worked, Rutt thought otherwise .
Comments
i'll bite--why the selective coloring?
What is the reason for using it, and what are you trying to call attention to in the shot? Sure she has a nice smile, but why do I need to look at the pizza or her hair? Do those elements tell me anything?
It might be an ok street portrait maybe, without those elements. As it is, it does not work for me ok? ok.
_________
Here's the link to how it was done.. actually some good info on youtube! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9TTHad_RxU
You mean the greenish hands??? ha ha ha.. I missed that.
Who wants black & white constantly.. I like artistic shots/creative pp.
This shot was just a practice.. won't go in my galleries.
I was going through Patti's galleries and noticed she did a few of the selective desaturation with bright red on a few of her shots.
I hope she doesn't mind my reposting.. her's are wayyyy better!
I will admit to finding the feet, sexy :wow
My Galleries
Flicker
G+
Oh I'm dying here . Patti outed!!!
As I scrolled down before reading your words I was going to say that selective coloring can be gimmicky--then I noted the shoes and said to myself "although I do like the red shoes". Then I saw that it was Patti's .
I think it rarely works. I guess it didn't work on yours, though I applaud you for trying something new to you.
Her conversion rocks also. I think alot of times people do selective coloring and only work on the color part and don't fix the rest.
I have a horrible horrendous color selective shot in my gallery myself (I mean it's sooooo bad, but I can't bring myself to delete it--but I will when I get home in case a potential client should see it), I guess we all gotta try it--we just don't post it .
_________
Here's two shot's from Schindlers list that I think worked:
The hair and pizza is what caught my eye and made me take the shot.
My example wasn't the best example.. like I said- it was simply an exercise to use this technique, and my first attempt.
First attempts are funny.. like do you remember your first real kiss?
I can't see the shots for some reason--little red xs on my computer. But it has to be the little girl in the red coat right? It helped to tell a story and it made her stand out, the director had reasons for wanting her to stand out.
Like I said "rarely" works.
Don't like the strawberry shot either. So maybe we just have different tastes.
And yes I do remember my first kiss--all braces and sweetness.
_________
Was it perfect? :smooch Or did you, umm.. get better as time went on?
That's what I was getting at.
The second shot of the womans shoes out the window looks pretty good.
twin Mark IV's & a bunch of "L" glass
site ∙ facebook
You are wrong.. so wrong.
The reason I beg to differ is that there are tons of excellent shots out there:
http://smashinghub.com/25-beautiful-selective-color-photos.htm
Of the 25 in the above thread, I see at least 10-15 keepers.
If you see nothing that's appealing, your eyes need anti-depressants.
While were at it, it's surprising what gets put up at galleries:
http://andresserrano.org/
wink I'm outa the closet!! I have, on a very few occassions done a selective colour shot but you will notice that they have NEVER been posted here. I may be crazy but I'm not stupid ( no offense MisterB but I know the feelings here about selective colour and generally, I don't like them either).
My friend's daughter's shoes were just screaming at me to do it. She and her mum love the shot so for them it works. The Red Rider shot is the first I ever tried.
If you feel I must be excumunicated from the forum I will understand (hair shirt is on and I've put pebbles in my shoes for penance) bow
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
patti hinton photography
The only ones that I find tolerable are
young girl with the umbrella
earth marble in the hand
The rest look really tacky & overdone to my taste but that's just me. I've seen a few where the reflection only is in colour and they've been a bit interesting. One thing I absolutely detest are selectively coloured wedding shots. They REALLY look gimmicky and tacky to me. Just my 2 cents.
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
patti hinton photography
Hey, I took some knocks myself for one I posted last year. You're just lucky Rutt isn't around.
SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH or he'll hear you!!! :tiptoe:whew
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
patti hinton photography
I'm not talking about my shot- which was a first attempt at selective color, and the actual first usage of CS5.
I'm disputing your blanket statement that selective color "only works in Shindlers List"- which is a faulty statement.
Clearly there are many examples of selective color the DO work quite well, and you are simply giving your narrow opinion/personal preference.
Just like Hot Dogs -or- Hamburgers.. whatever floats your boat.
I remember this one! and I almost brought it up in the conversation as one of those rare times that it works. I thought it worked, Rutt thought otherwise .
Here is my attempt at selective coloring.
http://lizzardnyc.smugmug.com/Other/Andy-and-Sofia/10504968_mFxdM#729250588_toWC9-A-LB
I figure you can all use a belly laugh and tears streaming down your face.
_________
Ha ha ha.. well I'm sorry I opened Pandora's Box!
I like the usage of selective color.. despite this forums prevailing mindset of "If it ain't grainy, gritty, and from the city- it's shitty!"
I like that- but I'm a non-conformist.
Actually.. that's pretty nice, too.
Then again- I like Bull Dogs playing poker on black velvet..
enough said
_________
That's fine art! What's wrong with that?:D
Which takes us back to the other link you posted of that abstract scupture of pooh
... I'm still peeling potatoes.
patti hinton photography