What do you think

teamracephotosteamracephotos Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
edited September 29, 2010 in Other Cool Shots
What do you think caused the bright spot where the moon just went behind the cloud (upper right) to look like feathers. This is a 30 second exposure. Not a great image but the feathers caught my eye.

1019565111_6NRWo-XL.jpg

File name: DSC_0121-2.jpg
File size: 1690629 bytes (0x0, infbpp, 0x)
EXIF Summary: 30s f/8.0 ISO200 24mm (35mm eq:36mm)

Camera-Specific Properties:

Equipment Make: NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model: NIKON D200
Camera Software: Ver.2.01
Maximum Lens Aperture: f/2.8
Sensing Method: One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern: 692
Focal Length (35mm Equiv): 36 mm

Image-Specific Properties:

Horizontal Resolution: 300 dpi
Vertical Resolution: 300 dpi
Image Created: 2010:09:23 08:50:05
Exposure Time: 30 sec
F-Number: f/8.0
Exposure Program: Manual
ISO Speed Rating: 200
Lens Aperture: f/8.0
Exposure Bias: -2 EV
Subject Distance: 0.03 m
Metering Mode: Pattern
Light Source: Unknown
Flash: No Flash
Focal Length: 24.00 mm
Rendering: Custom
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Scene Capture Type: Standard
Gain Control: None
Contrast: Normal
Saturation: High
Sharpness: Hard
Subject Distance Range: Unknown
“I love not man the less, but Nature more.”
— Lord Byron

Comments

  • teamracephotosteamracephotos Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
    edited September 29, 2010
    Spoke with a photographer friend that was out with me when I captured this. He had similar results with his 30 second exposures. The clouds where moving quickly parallel to the ground. I know it's a crappy image. Just wondering if anybody has seen the same effect/light. M
    “I love not man the less, but Nature more.”
    — Lord Byron
  • reyvee61reyvee61 Registered Users Posts: 1,877 Major grins
    edited September 29, 2010
    I've never had it happen to me but I was going to say fast moving clouds
    Yo soy Reynaldo
  • DogdotsDogdots Registered Users Posts: 8,795 Major grins
    edited September 29, 2010
    Cool -- I too think you caught it long enough to catch the bright light off of the moon. Normally you'd see the whole moon shinning like that if it were a clear night. The moving clouds helps with the displaying of the light.

    I'd wouldn't say it's crappy at all. To me I really like it. Something different and something wonderful at the same time :D
  • DaddyODaddyO Registered Users Posts: 4,466 Major grins
    edited September 29, 2010
    I could hazard a guess but Mr. Cowley of Atmospheric Optics, if asked,
    might provide you with a more critical complete answer. :D
    Michael
  • teamracephotosteamracephotos Registered Users Posts: 492 Major grins
    edited September 29, 2010
    I was looking for the clouds to smear. This is a borrowed 24mm f2.8. The first time I used it, to my eye f8 seemed pretty sharp edge to edge. This was the second time using it and at night. That appearance of sharpness is what caught my eye. It appears only part of the image is in focus. I know movement is the major factor, so the other part is the direct light of the moon. Like catching moonbeams. I wonder if it can be duplicated or improved? Thanks for the comments and the link will check it out. M
    “I love not man the less, but Nature more.”
    — Lord Byron
Sign In or Register to comment.