Autumn Night on Mt. Rainier
coscorrosa
Registered Users Posts: 2,284 Major grins
And a sunrise photo at the end!
The weather at Mt. Rainier has been overcast and rainy the last few weeks, which is good for some types of photography (streams, waterfalls, forests, wildlife, detail shots of flowers and foliage, etc.) but not so good for sunrise/sunset/night photography. There was a brief break in the forecast Friday night through Saturday, so I left work early on Friday to try and catch it. The fact that there was a full moon meant I wasn't going to be getting any sleep from sunset through sunrise if the weather behaved (and it did and I didn't!).
Here are some of my favorites from the trip:
#1: Star trails above Edith Creek:
The clouds started to move in after that, which prevented a longer star trails shot, but there were still a lot of opportunities for other types of night shots.
#2: Moving clouds above Edith Creek:
And a hundred feet downstream...
#3: Moonlight and Myrtle Falls:
#4: After that it was a quick nap in the car before sunrise at Reflection Lakes:
The weather at Mt. Rainier has been overcast and rainy the last few weeks, which is good for some types of photography (streams, waterfalls, forests, wildlife, detail shots of flowers and foliage, etc.) but not so good for sunrise/sunset/night photography. There was a brief break in the forecast Friday night through Saturday, so I left work early on Friday to try and catch it. The fact that there was a full moon meant I wasn't going to be getting any sleep from sunset through sunrise if the weather behaved (and it did and I didn't!).
Here are some of my favorites from the trip:
#1: Star trails above Edith Creek:
The clouds started to move in after that, which prevented a longer star trails shot, but there were still a lot of opportunities for other types of night shots.
#2: Moving clouds above Edith Creek:
And a hundred feet downstream...
#3: Moonlight and Myrtle Falls:
#4: After that it was a quick nap in the car before sunrise at Reflection Lakes:
0
Comments
Ron
http://ront.smugmug.com/
Nikon D600, Nikon 85 f/1.8G, Nikon 24-120mm f/4, Nikon 70-300, Nikon SB-700, Canon S95
Blog: http://blog.scolephoto.com
Phil
http://bgarland.smugmug.com/
Website: Tom Price Photography
Blog: Capturing Photons
Facebook: Tom Price Photography
My Photo Gallery:Northern Focus Photography
I wish I was half the man that my dog thinks I am...
http://danielplumer.com/
Facebook Fan Page
Ron, how long was the exposure on #1? I'm going to Moab next week and there will be no moon for 2 weeks, so I'm going to do light painting, but would also love to do some star trails as well.
Could you describe your technique for these? I've never heard of shooting like this.
Cheers,
pjordan
To answer a few questions that were raised:
1) That you can't distinguish the non star-trails shot from day time shots:
I disagree. The cloud movement, the stars, the shade of blue in the sky, and the muted even lighting on the foreground are all dead giveaways that these shots were taken under moonlight. I don't expect the general public to be able to pick up all of these things necessarily (but they should know that something is a little off - which is part of the point), but as photographers there should be enough clues there.
2) That the shot may work better if it was more obvious it was night (by darkening it, etc.).
If this is coming from "it should be darker because I think it would look better that way" that's perfectly fine, if it's coming from "it should be darker to more accurately reflect the scene as it was" or "to distinguish it more from a daytime shot" I disagree.
My point in taking photos is not to objectively record what is in front of me. I am not an unbiased observer. I'm trying to enforce a viewpoint and communicate a specific feeling to the viewer. If you restrict yourself to a literal interpretation you're severely limiting your creative possibilities. It's not enough to see with your eyes, you need to visualize the scene with your brain and try to impart your view on it.
In the context of these photographs, my intent wasn't "hey, check out these night shots!"
Here's an example, this shot was taken at night well before dawn, a literal interpretation would be about 3-4 stops under exposed, but (to me) would fail evoke the same feeling:
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
That was 14 exposures combined (ISO 320, f/7.1, 16mm, at 5 minutes), the scene was front lit by a full moon which is why the foreground is so evenly lit. In the absence of a moon you'll either have to do some creative blending (taking a shot at dawn for example, waiting for an hour, and then doing the star trails shots), or light painting, or just using a silhouette as the foreground.
Here's a tutorial that explains the technique in more detail:
http://dgrin.smugmug.com/Tutorials/Photography-Projects/Startrails/13098771_t6ehR
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
I don't think that cloud movement is a dead giveaway of a nighttime extended exposure. Marc Adamus is a recognized landscape photographer who regularly includes cloud movement into his compositions which are shot during daylight or sunset/sunrise times of day.
I gravitate towards realism so it's just an artistic difference of opinion. To each their own!
Blog: http://blog.scolephoto.com
"Out where the rivers like to run, I stand alone, and take back something worth remembering..."
Three Dog Night
www.northwestnaturalimagery.com
The lighting is awesome in these shots. I've got to get out at night more. Oh, and maybe move up to the PNW. You really do have some amazing scenery up there.
Cheers,
-joel
Link to my Smugmug site
Duncan
Photo Blog
Photo Gallery | Blog | I'm Unemployed!
now THAT would be something to see!
"Out where the rivers like to run, I stand alone, and take back something worth remembering..."
Three Dog Night
www.northwestnaturalimagery.com