Online backup options
travischance
Registered Users Posts: 642 Major grins
All of my images are currently stored on a 1TB external hard drive. Additionally, I have that drive is backed up by another 500GB external. I recently received an offer from Carbonite to use their service for $55/year with unlimited storage. While the price is very attractive, there is nothing that states that the automatic backup works with externals. Has anyone used this service (or similar)?
The SmugMug / Amazon joint project would make the most sense, but based upon the number of images I have, its not the most cost effective. Thanks in advance!
The SmugMug / Amazon joint project would make the most sense, but based upon the number of images I have, its not the most cost effective. Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
You might also look into Backblaze. I have a two year subscription to BB for $99.00. They also give you a pretty good trial period to check them out. Don't know about Carbonite's trial.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=146355&highlight=backup
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
It did take about a month to upload around 500GB of data, but I am glad for the peace of mind of having an offsite solution.
Lightroomers.com
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
http://aws.amazon.com/s3/#pricing
twin Mark IV's & a bunch of "L" glass
site ∙ facebook
I've found that cloudberry gives me the least expensive way to use S3 as a backup solution. I'm also a control freak and want to control every aspect of a process so YMMV.
The backup solutions based on S3 tend to be more expensive than the ones that build their own storage, like Backblaze.com or mozy.com. I find it easier to understand the reliability of S3 based backup solutions than the non-S3 based solutions. Again YMMV.
Dan
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
Great if you are a geek. Using Backblaze, or Carbonite is way easier (They use S3).
Personally, I use Backblaze, have since they first started, it's just awesome.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
This seems to be the consensus everywhere I've looked. Pricing for both is essentially the same so that wasn't a real factor. In the end I chose BB as "backing up external hard drives" was clearly outlined on their site. Thanks everyone!
twin Mark IV's & a bunch of "L" glass
site ∙ facebook
I started out with Jungle Disk / S3 a few years ago. I bought the Jungle Disk app before they changed their pricing model, so it's a better deal for me, but the S3 fees are the same as everyone else. It's super easy to use (no geekdom needed...sorry Andy!) w/ Jungle Disk, but it more expensive if you have tons of data/photos. JD also lets you use RackSpace for storage instead of S3, which is cheaper for file transfers. Of course, the geekdom would come in if you wanted to write your own application to use the S3 backend...but that's just crazy talk. lol
I honestly don't use it any longer though, as I have too much data and it would be too expensive. I'm about to pull the trigger on BackBlaze, even though they are definitely not as resilient as something like S3 (but still plenty resilient for my needs).
.02
My external drive is usually plugged in, but this made me decide against backblaze.
I'm still using S3 & Jungledisk, but it is a pricey option. I'm probably going to switch, but one of my requirements is that the initial load be via hard drive (not uploading all of my files AGAIN!) and that it keeps data always even with the drive disconnected.
--- Denise
Musings & ramblings at https://denisegoldberg.blogspot.com
Thanks Denise. I saw this the other day when I decided to go with BB. The 30 day window won't be an issue for me as my external is used daily (I'm always shooting). What I don't like so far is having to leave my external on so that the files can be backed up (viruses, hackers etc)...
twin Mark IV's & a bunch of "L" glass
site ∙ facebook
HTH,
Nick
Sigma 18-50 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8
Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6, 50mm f/1.8
www.CottageInk.smugmug.com
NIKON D700
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
If you can afford it, a combined NAS / cloud backup solution would be the optimal combination.
This is the best approach to use. Especially if you have a very high rate of change (lots of new files or lots of files that are updated regularly). The advantages of this are that you will always have a current on-site backup from which to restore and the backup itself will take significantly less time than dribble-bit'ing the data to a cloud provider (your flow would be local machine to NAS device and NAS device to cloud provider).
Also be aware that a backup tool that does not correctly handle open files might leave you with corrupted files or possibly no file in your backup. Open file means a file that is opened by an application for read-write.
Lastly, if you are serious about backups, you need to test your solution periodically by recovering files. If you're the type to do a bare-metal backup (one that you can install on a like machine to recover from a machine failure), you'll want to test that too.
Good luck!
Their software allows you to back up to the their cloud service, an external hdd, or even a friend who is running the software.
My SmugMug
Neal Jacob
[URL="http://nealjacob.com/twitter"]Twitter[/URL]|[B][URL="http://photos.nealjacob.com"]SmugMug[/URL][/B
Yes - see my note about SMV in the original post.
twin Mark IV's & a bunch of "L" glass
site ∙ facebook
Sorry, I read right past that.
Neal Jacob
[URL="http://nealjacob.com/twitter"]Twitter[/URL]|[B][URL="http://photos.nealjacob.com"]SmugMug[/URL][/B
I'll add a vote for Crashplan. It makes it EASY to backup both locally and online. I found the UI and feature set superior to backblaze (which I used for a year) but recommend trying both.
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact