2010 Petit le Mans - Take 2
Last week a posted a few of my Petit le Mans pictures to BlueHoseJacket's thread. After posting those pics I decided I wasn't happy with how my images from the race looked. I edited my post in BHJ's thread to remove my images, nuked my S.M. gallery, scrapped all the camera raw data and started over with a folder of nothing but DNG files. It took a lot of time but now I've got all the images ranked and keyworded they way I want. I'm also much happier with the results of my post processing. I wanted to share some of the 2nd pass images with everyone and see if anyone has suggestions on things I could be doing better. So, thanks for looking... a second time!
For some of these shots, I ran the D90's ISO down to 100 (Low 1.0 in Nikon Speak). I was trying to keep from hitting f/22 or higher when operating in shutter priority at 1/125. Is this a pretty common practice for daylight panning shots?
ISO 100, 1/125 @ f11
ISO 100, 1/125 @ f16
ISO 100, 1/125 @ f13
Diagonal composition with panning... yes? no? :dunno
ISO 200, 1/250 @ f11
More often than not I found I was slightly ahead of the car with my panning. I've got a lot of shots where the rear tire of the car is along the edge of the frame:
ISO 400, 1/250 @ f16
Anyone else have this problem? I'm guessing that for some reason I'm trying to center up the front of the car in the frame.
I also tried some shallow depth of field head-on shots
ISO 100, 1/4000 @ f2.8
Please share any comments or suggestions you might have!
For some of these shots, I ran the D90's ISO down to 100 (Low 1.0 in Nikon Speak). I was trying to keep from hitting f/22 or higher when operating in shutter priority at 1/125. Is this a pretty common practice for daylight panning shots?
ISO 100, 1/125 @ f11
ISO 100, 1/125 @ f16
ISO 100, 1/125 @ f13
Diagonal composition with panning... yes? no? :dunno
ISO 200, 1/250 @ f11
More often than not I found I was slightly ahead of the car with my panning. I've got a lot of shots where the rear tire of the car is along the edge of the frame:
ISO 400, 1/250 @ f16
Anyone else have this problem? I'm guessing that for some reason I'm trying to center up the front of the car in the frame.
I also tried some shallow depth of field head-on shots
ISO 100, 1/4000 @ f2.8
Please share any comments or suggestions you might have!
0
Comments
A lover of all things photography.
Olympus E-500
My Smugmug Gallery
Thank you.
In regard to your question on framing. For the majority of cars I focus on the door mirror to be on the centre focus point as this then puts the car slightly back in the frame so there is space for the car to move into in the finished shot. I've also used the number on the door as an area to keep centred, basically anything that is obvious so you don't need to worry about looking all around the frame when panning to ensure you are not cutting it off so you can worry about a smooth pan all the way around.
I'm here to learn so please feel free to give me constructive criticism to help me become the photographer I desire to be.
Thanks. At this race I was just overwhelmed by finally seeing these cars in person, their speed and my lack of practice in panning. I was just aiming at the car and swinging the camera along. Next time I'm shooting motor racing I will try to pick a common spot on the car to aim at while panning. I think that will help a lot! I'm sure I should be applying the same trick to any panning shots.
Thank you! Trust me, #3 was pure luck
It's true, and even more important when shooting slower shutter speeds with subjects closer to you where their angle in relation to you changes more as you will likely only get one part sharp so knowing which part (the one you keep in the same point) is key.
I'm here to learn so please feel free to give me constructive criticism to help me become the photographer I desire to be.
Try shooting Funny Cars @ 300mph!
When I pan, I shoot for between the front/rear wheels- IGNORE the car, and shoot.
I also heard about shooting the mirror.. but NHRA cars don't have mirrors.