Steph last week (18+)

MP PhotographyMP Photography Registered Users Posts: 18 Big grins
edited October 19, 2010 in Go Figure
Had the chance to work with one of my friends again last week. It had been over a year since we last worked together. She was a little more comfortable with herself and pushed her limits a bit.

This is her first time being more revealing, and she played it off really well. Comments on the few would be highly welcomed.

I haven't totally done touch ups in some of the images, but wanted to share and get comments!

1053299693_9p38Q-L.jpg
1053299237_T2q2W-L.jpg
1053299322_Js248-L.jpg
1053299583_LMxfp-L.jpg
1053299089_7Pnfm-L.jpg
Michael Porowski
www.mp_photography.net

Comments

  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited October 18, 2010
    Michael, welcome to GF! clap.gif

    I'm getting very mixed feelings looking at these images. Here are my thoughts on a case-by case basis:
    1. thumb.gif Good idea, strong pose, and I even like the selective coloring mwink.gif
      :cry Shooting a femal model full height from a male eye level is a bad, BAD idea. And why have you oiled her?
    2. :cry I have nothing positive to say about this one. Her legs look huge, horror lighting clashes with a poorly applied makeup creating "raccoon eyes" effect, there is no story... A complete tosser, IMHO
    3. thumb.gif Another bold pose, nice highkey, and now you chosen correct vantage point. clap.gif
      :cry Is it OOF? headscratch.gifOr did you blur it? It looks way, WAY too soft... ne_nau.gif
    4. thumb.gif Love the red chair and the shadow on the wall. Boots seem to play well in this one.
      :cry The pose and a non-fashion undergarrments look cheap and cheesy. Amateur porn at best.
    5. headscratch.gif What's with all the paper? Just because? I think you're trying to tell us something, but I have no clue what exactly...ne_nau.gif
      :cry Her pose is unnatural, tense and not flattering. Semi-parallel legs (shins) rarely look good. She's not a skinny girl (which is fine), but you really don't want her to curve her body this way since it creates a lot of unsightly creases. Her left shoulder is a close analogy of a "boob grap". There are tons of ways to have a model completely naked and do not show "anything" without resorting to such entry-level moves. The limbs shall be placed to help the image, while at the same time covering "hot" zones, not just used as a desperate gesture to cover one's crotch/nipples.
    HTH
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • MP PhotographyMP Photography Registered Users Posts: 18 Big grins
    edited October 19, 2010
    TY for all the comments, and it is helpful...wish i has more...

    #1: oiled for the sweaty look

    #2: just fooling around...

    in #3 did add some soft focus in post to change the look/feel to make usable.


    #4, all she had, and happen to pull this one. I have a "few" others I might use...

    #5: just trying something different w/ the papers, no message other then in the papers...hehe
    she was worred about the topless image (earlier in the shoot then the rope)


    Nikolai wrote: »
    Michael, welcome to GF! clap.gif

    I'm getting very mixed feelings looking at these images. Here are my thoughts on a case-by case basis:
    1. thumb.gif Good idea, strong pose, and I even like the selective coloring mwink.gif
      :cry Shooting a femal model full height from a male eye level is a bad, BAD idea. And why have you oiled her?
    2. :cry I have nothing positive to say about this one. Her legs look huge, horror lighting clashes with a poorly applied makeup creating "raccoon eyes" effect, there is no story... A complete tosser, IMHO
    3. thumb.gif Another bold pose, nice highkey, and now you chosen correct vantage point. clap.gif
      :cry Is it OOF? headscratch.gifOr did you blur it? It looks way, WAY too soft... ne_nau.gif
    4. thumb.gif Love the red chair and the shadow on the wall. Boots seem to play well in this one.
      :cry The pose and a non-fashion undergarrments look cheap and cheesy. Amateur porn at best.
    5. headscratch.gif What's with all the paper? Just because? I think you're trying to tell us something, but I have no clue what exactly...ne_nau.gif
      :cry Her pose is unnatural, tense and not flattering. Semi-parallel legs (shins) rarely look good. She's not a skinny girl (which is fine), but you really don't want her to curve her body this way since it creates a lot of unsightly creases. Her left shoulder is a close analogy of a "boob grap". There are tons of ways to have a model completely naked and do not show "anything" without resorting to such entry-level moves. The limbs shall be placed to help the image, while at the same time covering "hot" zones, not just used as a desperate gesture to cover one's crotch/nipples.
    HTH
    Michael Porowski
    www.mp_photography.net
Sign In or Register to comment.