Fantastic composition. Is this a digital edit or are there multiple doorways on the stair case. What is this place? Whatever it is it's facinating. Great work.
Thank you everyone! I was told a few years ago that compositing is a slippery slope, and it is. It's way fun though and gives me a sense of identity as well as a vent for my creative urges.
nice composition. I think it would be more effective if you removed the rainbows from the inner doorways
Yeah, I had been thinking about that as well. I can see it both ways. It does make the image more intriguing, but it's also a bit of a giveaway that it's a composite.
Yeah, I had been thinking about that as well. I can see it both ways. It does make the image more intriguing, but it's also a bit of a giveaway that it's a composite.
Now that's a possibility. I don't want a viewer to think I'm trying to fool them though. It's been brought up that the rainbows should be extended through to the border, but I'm not real up on that. Originally I was thinking having streaked clouds wind through the doorways, but the openings are too confining.
Now that's a possibility. I don't want a viewer to think I'm trying to fool them though. It's been brought up that the rainbows should be extended through to the border, but I'm not real up on that. Originally I was thinking having streaked clouds wind through the doorways, but the openings are too confining.
I know i'll take some heat for this but isn't photoshoped images supposed to fool the viewer? shhhh I do it all the time
I know i'll take some heat for this but isn't photoshoped images supposed to fool the viewer? shhhh I do it all the time
Yes, but it's a little tricky. If you make it appear too convincing you run the risk that the viewer will not even notice that there's something strange going on and look more closely. That's why I am ambivalent about the second rainbow in this one.
Oh, and BTW, you would get lots of heat for that on the Street forum but not here. I trust BD isn't reading this.
Yes, but it's a little tricky. If you make it appear too convincing you run the risk that the viewer will not even notice that there's something strange going on and look more closely. That's why I am ambivalent about the second rainbow in this one.
Oh, and BTW, you would get lots of heat for that on the Street forum but not here. I trust BD isn't reading this.
From elsewhere:
---- I'm not out to fool or counterfeit, but more to express a dream-state. I enjoy incorporating illusions in my work--something that isn't quite right--illogical. I'll give it some time. I may just end up replacing the sky. Compositing is way more fun for me than traditional photography is. ----
Never tried this, but find it intriguing. Can you lead me towards any tutorials on how to do this?
Mary,
Compositing is great fun but may require quite a lot of work. I've spent days on getting a single image to look good. The best resource I've found is a book by Katrin Eismann, Photoshop Masking & Compositing. Be warned: it's not easy, but she does take you through things step-by-step. Many of the techniques are useful even if you are not doing composites.
Compositing is great fun but may require quite a lot of work. I've spent days on getting a single image to look good. The best resource I've found is a book by Katrin Eismann, Photoshop Masking & Compositing. Be warned: it's not easy, but she does take you through things step-by-step. Many of the techniques are useful even if you are not doing composites.
Thanks for the recommendation. I just took a brief look at it and it looks like fun. It will be hard, but I'm up to the challenge
As for Neils recommendation..I'm still trying to figure out how to do it
As for Neils recommendation..I'm still trying to figure out how to do it
Mary, you do need some tek, for instance a wand, and some flouncy robes etc. You'll need the textbooks, of course, available from any bookstore, just look for Harry Potter. I believe there is a regular rail service to the college, leaves from Victoria Street station platform 9 3/4, which is anywhere and everywhere to those in the know. Or you could always hop on a broomstick. The first skill you learn, as all children know, is to suspend disbelief!
Very neat piece Walter. Really like the stone colors and such. Plus the
image remaining sharp to center infinity. The moody threatening clouds are a great color too.
Thanks for the recommendation. I just took a brief look at it and it looks like fun. It will be hard, but I'm up to the challenge
As for Neils recommendation..I'm still trying to figure out how to do it
Thanks again everyone. I have a copy of Katrin Eismann's book. It's very good. I bought it to learn how to select hair (and consquently leaves, blades of grass etc.) and build masks, but I keep getting lost in the last stages of the process for some reason and end up doing my own thing. One trick I've learned is to burn fringed edges into blending with the background. Time is the main ingredient. It seems though, no matter how much time it takes, it doesn't take as much time as it would to paint with a brush on canvas. A couple weeks ago I was talking to a sculptor about this. She laughed when I said one photo had taken me about 12 hours to finish. She showed me a piece that had taken her 10-12 hours a day for a month. Hopefully, if I put the time element out of mind, I can get into something I really like.
Very neat piece Walter. Really like the stone colors and such. Plus the
image remaining sharp to center infinity. The moody threatening clouds are a great color too.
Thanks. One of the things I like about compositing is if I shoot right on every image the DOF is snappy clear all the way through. I liked that in my landscapes shooting/processing traditionally. Now I'm really getting into it. I think of it like stacking.
Thanks again everyone. I have a copy of Katrin Eismann's book. It's very good. I bought it to learn how to select hair (and consquently leaves, blades of grass etc.) and build masks, but I keep getting lost in the last stages of the process for some reason and end up doing my own thing. One trick I've learned is to burn fringed edges into blending with the background. Time is the main ingredient. It seems though, no matter how much time it takes, it doesn't take as much time as it would to paint with a brush on canvas. A couple weeks ago I was talking to a sculptor about this. She laughed when I said one photo had taken me about 12 hours to finish. She showed me a piece that had taken her 10-12 hours a day for a month. Hopefully, if I put the time element out of mind, I can get into something I really like,
-
This will be a whole new learning experience for me since I'm not really photoshop literate. I can do basic things, but this is much more advanced then the information my brain holds
It will certainly help me pass the long winter months. I'm looking forward to it.
Comments
Tom
www.jsqueri.smugmug.com
Cooo... oool!!!
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
www.Dogdotsphotography.com
-
My Website
Facebook | Twitter | | VSCOgrid | Instagram |
Yeah, I had been thinking about that as well. I can see it both ways. It does make the image more intriguing, but it's also a bit of a giveaway that it's a composite.
Now that's a possibility. I don't want a viewer to think I'm trying to fool them though. It's been brought up that the rainbows should be extended through to the border, but I'm not real up on that. Originally I was thinking having streaked clouds wind through the doorways, but the openings are too confining.
I know i'll take some heat for this but isn't photoshoped images supposed to fool the viewer? shhhh I do it all the time
My Website
Facebook | Twitter | | VSCOgrid | Instagram |
Yes, but it's a little tricky. If you make it appear too convincing you run the risk that the viewer will not even notice that there's something strange going on and look more closely. That's why I am ambivalent about the second rainbow in this one.
Oh, and BTW, you would get lots of heat for that on the Street forum but not here. I trust BD isn't reading this.
From elsewhere:
---- I'm not out to fool or counterfeit, but more to express a dream-state. I enjoy incorporating illusions in my work--something that isn't quite right--illogical. I'll give it some time. I may just end up replacing the sky. Compositing is way more fun for me than traditional photography is. ----
& here's one of my favorite examples:
-
I think I'll try another sky before I give this up for done.
(Yikes, I think I did a slight desaturation layer on the other)
-
Never tried this, but find it intriguing. Can you lead me towards any tutorials on how to do this?
www.Dogdotsphotography.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hogwarts_School_of_Witchcraft_and_Wizardry
*
!
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
roflGood one --
www.Dogdotsphotography.com
Mary,
Compositing is great fun but may require quite a lot of work. I've spent days on getting a single image to look good. The best resource I've found is a book by Katrin Eismann, Photoshop Masking & Compositing. Be warned: it's not easy, but she does take you through things step-by-step. Many of the techniques are useful even if you are not doing composites.
Thanks for the recommendation. I just took a brief look at it and it looks like fun. It will be hard, but I'm up to the challenge
As for Neils recommendation..I'm still trying to figure out how to do it
www.Dogdotsphotography.com
Mary, you do need some tek, for instance a wand, and some flouncy robes etc. You'll need the textbooks, of course, available from any bookstore, just look for Harry Potter. I believe there is a regular rail service to the college, leaves from Victoria Street station platform 9 3/4, which is anywhere and everywhere to those in the know. Or you could always hop on a broomstick. The first skill you learn, as all children know, is to suspend disbelief!
Happy magik!
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
image remaining sharp to center infinity. The moody threatening clouds are a great color too.
Thanks again everyone. I have a copy of Katrin Eismann's book. It's very good. I bought it to learn how to select hair (and consquently leaves, blades of grass etc.) and build masks, but I keep getting lost in the last stages of the process for some reason and end up doing my own thing. One trick I've learned is to burn fringed edges into blending with the background. Time is the main ingredient. It seems though, no matter how much time it takes, it doesn't take as much time as it would to paint with a brush on canvas. A couple weeks ago I was talking to a sculptor about this. She laughed when I said one photo had taken me about 12 hours to finish. She showed me a piece that had taken her 10-12 hours a day for a month. Hopefully, if I put the time element out of mind, I can get into something I really like.
Thanks. One of the things I like about compositing is if I shoot right on every image the DOF is snappy clear all the way through. I liked that in my landscapes shooting/processing traditionally. Now I'm really getting into it. I think of it like stacking.
-
This will be a whole new learning experience for me since I'm not really photoshop literate. I can do basic things, but this is much more advanced then the information my brain holds
It will certainly help me pass the long winter months. I'm looking forward to it.
www.Dogdotsphotography.com