Well summers over and it's time to get the feeders out...the perches (grapevines) and blind setup. It didn't take long until these little ones showed up.
Click on me for more info.
Notice that the sound these guys make is very similar to that of an old Plymouth with a weak starter motor!
it could be there on vacation or just dating .I was just looking at the 2 in a id book and you really have to have a ?? to tell them apart but location is a big one and the white marks on the coverts --you are right but you know that
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
I live in the St. Louis area, have many photos of Chickadees and have not
been able to tell the difference between Carolina and Black-capped, at least
in my photos. We're right on the dividing line and hybrids are in the mix.
Wow Ric, I've never seen such phenomenal photographs of the Black-capped Chickadee!<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> You really have a way with capturing wildlife in its natural state.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Fantastic captures! Unbelievable..
Wow Ric, I've never seen such phenomenal photographs of the Black-capped Chickadee!<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> You really have a way with capturing wildlife in its natural state.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Fantastic captures! Unbelievable..
Couldn't agree more... of course, there's nothing like baiting your subject, then shooting it from the semi-controlled environment of your backyard.<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/ne_nau.gif" border="0" alt="" >
Wow Ric, I've never seen such phenomenal photographs of the Black-capped Chickadee!<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> You really have a way with capturing wildlife in its natural state.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Fantastic captures! Unbelievable..
Couldn't agree more... of course, there's nothing like baiting your subject, then shooting it from the semi-controlled environment of your backyard.<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/ne_nau.gif" border="0" alt="" >
I couldn't disagree more. Setting up a feeder is not considered as harmful baiting. It does not change the birds' normal habits. The Audubon Society and the American Birding Association sanction and encourage the setting up of bird feeders.
Other types of baiting are discouraged and is harmful to one's subjects and are considered to be unethical.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Ric, that last shot is outstanding,perfect branch for a beautiful chickadee. And I don't consider it to be baiting for this shot but John I think you are dead wrong, the beauty and integrity greatly diminishes when harmful baiting or other techniques are employed by so called nature lovers. Not everything should count to get the shot.
Hmmm . . I don't think I endorsed harmful baiting. I just think it's silly to quibble over the effort involved in creating an image when appreciating the image itself. If I can get a shot of a grizzly bear with a 500mm lens, is my shot less beautiful than the virtually identical one you risked your life to get with a 105? (Hey, you stepped in front of me!) Maybe you have a greater appreciation for the experience of obtaining the image, but why should a viewer of the two images care? If it's a beautiful image, it's a beautiful image.
I just thought the comment to which I replied was snide.
Years ago I took some photos of a leopard in the South African bush. They were crap, but I still value them. The images I can get today at the National Zoo are better. If I represent those images as "wild" I'm a lying dog, but they are still better images.
John :
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Ric, that last shot is outstanding,perfect branch for a beautiful chickadee.
Thanks, Deb!
I took a look at your work and can see you have an eye. The Snowy Owl at sunset is one of the most pleasing compositions I have ever seen...more like a painting than a photograph.
Comments
Doug
http://dougsphotos.smugmug.com/
Cheers, Don
Product Photography
My Acreage Bird Photographs
Dennis Kaczor Photography
My website | NANPA Member
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
I live in northern Illinois, Jeff.
Carolinas don't get this far north.
I suppose a hybrid of the two is possible.
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Thanks, JJ!
[your heading into winter must mean we're heading for summer down here ]
Bugs
Spiders
Flowers
Thanks, Doug!
I live in the St. Louis area, have many photos of Chickadees and have not
been able to tell the difference between Carolina and Black-capped, at least
in my photos. We're right on the dividing line and hybrids are in the mix.
My Website index | My Blog
You really have a way with capturing wildlife in its natural state.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
Fantastic captures! Unbelievable..
Couldn't agree more... of course, there's nothing like baiting your subject, then shooting it from the semi-controlled environment of your backyard.<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6029383/emoji/ne_nau.gif" border="0" alt="" >
Karl Krieger
Helena, Montana
website : www.naturezonephotography.com
Thanks, Don.
I couldn't disagree more. Setting up a feeder is not considered as harmful baiting. It does not change the birds' normal habits. The Audubon Society and the American Birding Association sanction and encourage the setting up of bird feeders.
http://www.aba.org/about/ethics.html
Other types of baiting are discouraged and is harmful to one's subjects and are considered to be unethical.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
:bs
The quality and beauty of a photo have virtually nothing to do with the difficulties involved in creating it.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
I just thought the comment to which I replied was snide.
Years ago I took some photos of a leopard in the South African bush. They were crap, but I still value them. The images I can get today at the National Zoo are better. If I represent those images as "wild" I'm a lying dog, but they are still better images.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
I think Deb is sensitive to this issue and misunderstood where you were coming from.....that's my take anyway.
I took your words as you meant them (I think) and appreciate your comments.
Thanks, Deb!
I took a look at your work and can see you have an eye. The Snowy Owl at sunset is one of the most pleasing compositions I have ever seen...more like a painting than a photograph.
I'm so glad you liked them.
greetings,
Korandoke
Korandoke